Monday 30 March 2026Afternoon Edition

ZOTPAPER

News without the noise


Australia

Queensland Doctors Condemn Government Plan to Scrap Drug Diversion Laws in Hardline Crackdown

Medical association says removing three-strikes diversion system will push drug users away from treatment and into the criminal justice system

Zotpaper2 min read
The Australian Medical Association Queensland has sharply criticised the state government's proposal to scrap drug diversion laws, warning that removing the three-strikes system will funnel people with addiction into the criminal justice system rather than toward treatment.

Under the current framework, people caught with small quantities of drugs can be diverted to treatment programs up to three times before facing criminal charges. The Queensland government wants to abolish this system as part of what it describes as a crackdown on addiction and criminal offending.

The AMAQ argues the existing diversion framework is evidence-based and that removing it would be a retrograde step that ignores decades of health research showing that treating addiction as a medical issue rather than a criminal one produces better outcomes for individuals and communities.

The proposal comes as the Queensland government faces pressure from conservative quarters to take a tougher stance on drug-related crime. Critics of the government's plan say it conflates drug use with serious criminal behaviour and will disproportionately affect Indigenous Australians and people experiencing homelessness.

Analysis

Why This Matters

Drug policy is one of those areas where the evidence and the politics rarely align. The medical consensus strongly favours diversion and treatment over criminalisation, but governments face electoral pressure to appear tough on crime.

Background

Queensland's drug diversion program has been in place for years and is broadly consistent with approaches taken in other Australian states. The proposed changes would make Queensland an outlier in moving away from health-first drug policy.

Key Perspectives

The government frames this as protecting communities from drug-fuelled crime. The medical community frames it as abandoning vulnerable people. Both sides claim to be acting in the public interest.

What to Watch

Whether the government softens the proposal in response to medical opposition, or whether the tough-on-crime framing wins out in the current political climate.

Sources