Supreme Court Chief Justice Imposes Nondisclosure Agreements on Clerks and Staff
Move to increase secrecy comes amid calls for greater transparency following ethics revelations
The NDAs represent an unprecedented formalization of the courts traditional code of silence, legally binding employees to confidentiality in ways that go beyond previous informal expectations.
The decision appears to be a response to recent leaks and disclosures about the court, including information about deliberations on major cases and justices personal conduct.
Critics argue the move will make it even harder for the public to understand how the nations highest court operates, at a time when trust in the institution has declined significantly.
Analysis
Why This Matters
The Supreme Court already operates with less transparency than other branches of government, and these NDAs could further shield it from accountability.
Background
Recent years have seen multiple controversies involving Supreme Court justices, including questions about gifts, travel, and ethical standards.
Key Perspectives
Transparency advocates argue the public has a right to understand judicial decision-making, while court defenders say confidentiality protects the integrity of deliberations.
What to Watch
Whether any current or former employees challenge the NDAs and how Congress responds to this assertion of judicial secrecy.