For years, Australia's major supermarkets have faced intense public and political backlash over concerns about pricing, market power, and treatment of suppliers. Woolworths, in particular, has been a frequent target of criticism from politicians and regulator scrutiny from the consumer watchdog. But according to columnist Elizabeth Knight, the company may have found a path back to relevance: aggressive discounting and the return of collectible campaigns such as Ooshies.
Knight's commentary, published across Nine newspapers on Wednesday, frames Woolworths' strategy as a direct response to its battered public image. Instead of relying on loyalty programs or premium ranges, the retailer is engaging in what she describes as "discounting one-upmanship" — a price war with rival Coles that aims to win over cost-conscious consumers.
The return of Ooshies, a line of collectible toys that previously drove significant foot traffic, is a key part of the strategy. The collectibles tap into both nostalgia and family appeal, encouraging repeat visits and larger baskets. Combined with aggressive price cuts on staples, the approach is designed to signal that Woolworths is on the side of the household budget.
"Engaging in discounting one-upmanship is a good start," Knight writes, acknowledging that the supermarket giants remain unpopular but arguing that tangible price relief could begin to rebuild trust.
The broader context is a supermarket sector under sustained pressure. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has been examining supermarket pricing practices, with a focus on whether major chains are using market power unfairly. Politicians on both sides have accused the chains of profiteering during a cost-of-living crisis, leading to inquiries and repeated calls for stronger regulation.
While the article presents discounting as a promising turn, it does not suggest that Woolworths is out of the woods. The price wars could raise questions about sustainability — both for the supermarkets' margins and for the suppliers who may be squeezed to fund promotions. There is also the risk that consumers see the discounts as nothing more than an attempt to distract from deeper structural issues.
Neither Woolworths nor Coles responded directly to the column, but both have previously defended their pricing and promotional strategies as competitive and beneficial to shoppers.
Knight does not predict a quick return to public favour, but her analysis suggests that a visible commitment to lower prices may be the most effective response to the criticism the sector faces. Whether the strategy can hold — and whether regulators will accept it as genuine competition rather than another form of market gamesmanship — remains to be seen.