Monday 30 March 2026Afternoon Edition

ZOTPAPER

News without the noise


Space

NASA Boss Blasts Boeing and Space Agency for Botched Starliner Mission

New NASA leadership criticises decision-making that left two astronauts stranded on the ISS for nine months

Zotpaper2 min read
NASA's new administrator has sharply criticised both Boeing and the space agency itself over the bungled Starliner mission that left astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams stranded on the International Space Station for nine months instead of the planned eight-day stay.

A new report from NASA leadership details significant failings in decision-making throughout the Starliner program. The administrator called out systemic issues in how both Boeing and NASA managed the crewed test flight, which launched in June 2025 but was deemed too risky for a return journey due to thruster failures and helium leaks.

The astronauts were ultimately brought home by SpaceX in February 2026, an embarrassing outcome for Boeing's commercial crew program that was already years behind schedule and billions over budget.

The report is expected to influence future decisions about Boeing's role in NASA's commercial crew program and may accelerate the shift toward SpaceX as the primary provider of crewed ISS transportation.

Analysis

Why This Matters

This is the most direct criticism of Boeing's space program from NASA leadership to date. It signals a potential turning point in how NASA manages its commercial partnerships.

Background

Boeing's Starliner program has been plagued by delays since its first uncrewed test flight failed to reach the ISS in 2019. The program is billions over its original fixed-price contract.

Key Perspectives

Boeing faces reputational damage across both its aviation and space divisions. NASA must balance accountability with maintaining competition in the commercial crew market.

What to Watch

Watch for whether Boeing retains its commercial crew contract or if NASA moves to consolidate around SpaceX. Congressional hearings are likely.

Sources