In a significant tightening of gambling regulations, the NSW Labor government has unveiled new measures requiring all venues with poker machines to implement facial recognition technology and join a centralized exclusion register. The reforms, reported by The Age and Sydney Morning Herald, aim to curb problem gambling by identifying self-excluded patrons and barring them from gaming areas across the state.
Under the new rules, every gaming room in NSW—from large clubs to small pubs—must install facial recognition systems that scan visitors' faces and cross-reference them against the statewide exclusion list. The register, managed by the state's gambling regulator, will include individuals who have voluntarily banned themselves as well as those placed under exclusion orders by authorities. Venues that fail to comply face strict enforcement measures, including potential license suspensions and significant fines.
The decision to mandate facial recognition marks a major escalation from previous voluntary schemes, which critics argued were ineffective due to patchy adoption and lack of interoperability between venues. The government argues the technology will close loopholes that allowed barred gamblers to simply move to another venue.
However, the reforms also represent a notable retreat from earlier Labor proposals. The party has abandoned plans for a super profits tax on high-revenue poker machine venues, a policy that had been floated as a way to fund harm reduction programs. Instead, the government will rely on existing taxation structures and venue contributions to cover the costs of implementing the new technology.
Privacy advocates have raised concerns about the mandatory use of biometric surveillance in public spaces, arguing it sets a precedent for mass monitoring without adequate safeguards. The government has responded that facial data will be stored securely, used only for exclusion checks, and not shared with law enforcement without a warrant.
The reforms are expected to be phased in over two years, beginning with larger venues. Industry groups have expressed caution about implementation costs but have generally welcomed the clarity the new rules provide after months of uncertainty.