LLMs struggle to match multidisciplinary tumor board discussions in new benchmark

OpenTumorBoard evaluates 14 models on 611 patient cases, finding best scores of only 3.43 out of 5 for clinical equivalence and 2.78 out of 5 for board consensus alignment.

Big Tech
Anqi Li · Zhixuan Ge · Yixuan Duan · Jiarong Qian · Chi-Yu Chen · MingYu Lu · +6 more

Rice University · University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign · University of Washington · National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · Microsoft

Research Digest··3 min read
The authors introduce OpenTumorBoard, a benchmark derived from 12,534 minutes of publicly available tumor board recordings on YouTube, comprising 611 patient cases and 19,157 discussion turns across ten specialist roles.

The authors curated and transcribed 12,534 minutes of real multidisciplinary tumor board meetings from YouTube, resulting in 611 patient cases and 19,157 discussion turns involving ten specialist roles.

Why this paper

From Microsoft and 5 others

In one line

OpenTumorBoard benchmarks LLMs on multidisciplinary tumor board discussions with 611 cases, revealing maximum scores of 3.43/5 and 2.78/5.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ·No stated limitations found
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§
newspaper

Research Digest

Articles published under the Zotpaper byline are synthesized from multiple source publications by our AI editor and reviewed by our editorial process. Each story combines reporting from credible outlets to give readers a balanced, comprehensive view.