The Northern Territory has become the final state or territory in Australia to legalise voluntary assisted dying (VAD), with its parliament passing the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill on Thursday. The legislation, which passed with near-unanimous support in a conscience vote — only one member abstained — is the culmination of a long and complex legal history.
“This makes the NT the last Australian jurisdiction to legalise voluntary assisted dying. It will be available to Territorians in early 2028,” wrote Ben White and Kat Waller of the Australian Centre for Health Law Research at Queensland University of Technology in The Conversation.
The NT’s path to legalisation has been uniquely protracted. It originally enacted the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act in the mid-1990s — the first law of its kind in the world — but the federal government banned territories from making laws on the topic in 1997, overriding the NT legislation. That federal ban was finally lifted in 2022, allowing the NT to legislate again. An independent expert advisory panel in 2024 and a parliamentary committee in 2025 each recommended legalisation, with the committee’s proposed model largely reflected in the bill now passed.
Under the new law, eligibility criteria broadly mirror those in other Australian states. A person must be 18 or older, have decision-making capacity, and be suffering intolerably from an advanced, progressive medical condition expected to cause death within 12 months. Two independent doctors with training in VAD must assess each case, and a review board will provide oversight. Health professionals retain the right to conscientiously object.
However, the NT presents unique challenges. It has the highest proportion of Indigenous residents of any state or territory, and almost half of its population lives in rural or remote areas. The article notes these factors will shape how VAD is implemented and accessed. The government will now need to develop a regulatory framework, train medical practitioners, and ensure equitable access across vast distances.
Supporters argue the law provides choice and dignity for terminally ill Territorians, while critics have raised concerns about safeguards in remote communities and cultural sensitivities. The implementation timeline of early 2028 gives authorities time to address these issues.