The clash between the Productivity Commission and Western Australia's Labor government has escalated into open political warfare, with Commissioner Angela Jackson insisting that the country's leading independent economic advisory body is being unfairly maligned.
Speaking on Tuesday, Jackson — co-author of the commission's August 14 report — said robust debate over policy was welcome but personal attacks on the commission's integrity crossed a line. "We welcome scrutiny of our analysis, we welcome criticism, but when you start attacking the integrity of the commission itself as an institution, that's unacceptable," she told reporters.
The dispute stems from the commission's assessment of the GST distribution deal struck under former Prime Minister Scott Morrison. The report called the arrangement a "costly mistake" that has cost other states an estimated $23 billion over the life of the deal, which guarantees Western Australia at least 70 cents for every dollar of GST revenue it generates.
Premier Roger Cook reacted furiously to the findings, branding the commissioners "east coast clowns" and accusing them of bias against Western Australia. He has since doubled down, arguing that the deal corrected a long-standing inequity for the resource-rich state and that any attempt to unwind it would punish Western Australians for the nation's mining boom.
Jackson also took aim at the federal government's position, saying it was "disappointing" that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had ruled out revisiting the deal. The Prime Minister, seeking to avoid a damaging political fight ahead of the next election, has publicly backed the existing arrangement, a stance that has frustrated smaller states like South Australia and Tasmania who argue they are being short-changed.
The Productivity Commission is Australia's chief microeconomic reform advisory body, and its reports are intended to inform government policy without fear or favour. Critics of the Cook government's response argue that the personal attacks undermine the very notion of independent, evidence-based advice. Supporters of the WA position, however, contend that the commission's east‑coast perspective fails to account for the unique fiscal challenges facing the nation's largest exporting state.
With national cabinet meetings and ongoing budget pressures, the GST carve-up is likely to remain a flashpoint in federal-state relations for the foreseeable future.