Alternating AI agents across sessions beats single agents on machine learning tasks

A workflow that caps each session at k experiments and resets context reaches state-of-the-art any-medal rates on MLE-bench.

Big Tech
Changye Li · Zijian Zhang · Muheng Li · Yiduo Pang · Tingjun Wu · Menghan Li · +9 more

Tsinghua University · NVIDIA · Zhejiang University · MIT

Research Digest··2 min read
The authors identify two failure modes in long-horizon machine learning agents: long-horizon deceleration, where reasoning intensity drops as a session stretches, and harness staleness, where custom tooling helps less as base models improve.

The authors measured output tokens per response across six models and found reasoning intensity declines as score gains diminish.

Why this paper

From NVIDIA and 3 others

In one line

Alternating two LLM agents with context resets and experiment caps outperforms single-agent workflows on long-horizon machine learning engineering.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks (2 benchmarks)

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe