Brazil court orders Meta to give Lula and Bolsonaro equal treatment on Instagram

Internal messages reportedly acknowledged the president's accounts were negatively affected ahead of October 25 runoff

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Brazil's top electoral court has ordered Meta to immediately adopt measures ensuring equal treatment of the two presidential candidates on its platforms, after President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva filed a complaint accusing the company of biased algorithms, and a newspaper reported that Meta employees internally acknowledged Lula's Instagram accounts were negatively affected by restrictions.

Justice Marco Aurelio Bellizze of Brazil's Superior Electoral Court ruled on Thursday that Meta must not reduce the distribution of political content, restrict searches or remove posts in a way that creates an imbalance between Lula and right-wing challenger Senator Flavio Bolsonaro. The ruling also orders the company to ensure its artificial intelligence tool applies identical criteria to both candidacies, under a daily fine of 500,000 reais ($98,700) for non-compliance.

The ruling came hours after Lula filed a complaint accusing Meta, which owns Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp, of using biased algorithms and AI restrictions to favour Bolsonaro. According to Lula's party, some of his posts appeared without a share button and had reduced reach, with options for reactions, sharing, audio or accelerated speed missing.

On Friday, Brazilian daily Folha de S Paulo reported that internal Meta communications, which the paper said it had reviewed, acknowledged Lula's accounts were negatively affected by restrictions during the election and that the platform recommended Bolsonaro's profile and WhatsApp channel.

Meta told the Reuters news agency that the technical issues cited in the report were already public and that the conversations referenced related solely to the severity of the issues, not political interference. "Any suggestion that Meta favors one side is false," it added.

The two candidates will face each other in a presidential runoff on October 25, after Bolsonaro's stronger-than-expected performance in the first-round vote.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case tests whether courts can compel platforms to neutralise algorithmic effects during elections, a question with implications beyond Brazil.
  • Lula's complaint targets AI-driven content distribution, a growing concern for regulators worldwide.
  • The outcome could shape how Meta runs its platforms in Brazil, one of its largest markets, during the runoff.

Background

The runoff on October 25 pits left-wing incumbent Lula against right-wing senator Bolsonaro, who outperformed expectations in the first round earlier this month. Claims about platform bias in elections are not new, but this case is notable because a court has ordered a company to make its AI tools apply identical criteria to two candidates, backed by a per-day fine.

Key Perspectives

Meta: Says the technical issues were already public, that internal conversations referred only to the severity of those issues, and that any suggestion it favours one side is false. Lula's party: Alleges biased algorithms and AI restrictions reduced the president's reach, citing posts missing share buttons and other functions. The electoral court: Determined that Meta must adopt measures to equalise treatment of the candidates, ordering the company to comply or pay a daily fine.

What to Watch

  • Whether Meta makes visible changes to content distribution and AI criteria before the October 25 runoff.
  • Whether the court enforces the daily fine if Meta is found non-compliant.
  • The runoff result, and whether either side claims platform interference shaped the outcome.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe