Friday 9 October 2026
Evening EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Australia

Chalmers steps in as ATO credit card ban delayed by a year

Government to fund transition period after criticism from business groups, opposition and Labor backbench

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources4 outlets
The Australian Taxation Office's plan to stop accepting credit card payments will no longer take effect at the end of next month, after the federal government negotiated with the independent agency to delay the change by a year. Treasurer Jim Chalmers will allocate additional funds to support the transition.

The ban, which had been scheduled to begin on November 30, came under heavy criticism from the business community, opposition parties and some members of the Labor backbench, who argued it would damage the cash-flow management of small businesses.

Chalmers will provide the ATO with extra funding to support a year-long transition period. However, the government is not expected to cover the entire $200 million in fees the tax office cited would be charged to taxpayers when it announced the ban.

Appearing on Seven's Sunrise on Friday morning, Environment Minister Murray Watt described the ATO's plan to ban credit card payments for tax bills, so as not to burden all taxpayers with the associated costs, as a completely "independent decision".

"When they made clear that they intended to proceed with this, we insisted on them having a good transition plan with the business community and to consult with the business community about that," Watt said.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Small businesses that rely on credit cards for cash-flow management will keep that payment option for at least another year.
  • The episode tests the relationship between the government and an independent agency facing political and commercial backlash over an operational decision.
  • The cost question is unresolved: taxpayers may still carry part of the $200 million in fees the ATO cited, since the government is not expected to cover the full amount.

Background

The ATO is an independent statutory agency, and decisions about how taxpayers can pay are normally its own call. The credit card ban was framed as a cost-saving measure to avoid passing merchant fees on to all taxpayers, but it drew immediate opposition from businesses that use credit cards to manage the timing of payments. The government's intervention, providing funding while insisting on consultation, reflects the competing pressures of respecting the agency's independence and responding to political and business concerns.

Key Perspectives

Small business groups and the opposition: Argued the ban would hurt cash-flow management and urged the ATO to reverse the decision, helping force the delay. The government: Portrays the ban as the ATO's independent decision, while saying it insisted on a proper transition plan and consultation with the business community before the change proceeds. Backbench and other critics: Saw the decision as damaging to small businesses and will be watching whether the transition delivers practical relief or simply postpones the problem.

What to Watch

  • The shape of the year-long transition plan and whether business groups are genuinely consulted on its design.
  • How much additional funding Chalmers allocates to the ATO, and whether part of the $200 million in fees is still passed on to taxpayers.
  • Whether the ban is eventually implemented after the transition period or abandoned entirely under continued pressure.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe