Sunday 4 October 2026
Afternoon EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Crypto

Clarity Act Set Aside as US Agencies Race to Fill Crypto Regulatory Void

Legislation intended to provide a bedrock for digital asset markets is being replaced by agency rulemaking, raising questions about durability

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
The Clarity Act, a bill designed to establish a comprehensive legal framework for cryptocurrency markets in the United States, appears to have stalled, with federal agencies now moving to substitute their own regulations in its place. The shift has prompted debate over whether agency rules can provide the lasting stability the industry has sought.

The Clarity Act, once billed as the legislative foundation for U.S. crypto markets, is no longer moving forward as originally envisioned. According to reporting from CoinDesk, federal agencies are racing to fill the gap with their own regulatory substitutes. The stand-in rules raise questions about their longevity, as agency regulations can be changed more easily than statutes passed by Congress.

While the exact reasons for the bill's sidelining remain unclear, the development marks a significant pivot in U.S. crypto policy. Agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), chaired by Paul Atkins according to the report, are now taking the lead in shaping the rules that will govern digital asset markets.

Industry observers are watching closely to see whether these agency-level regulations will hold up over time or whether they will face legal challenges or be overturned by a future administration. The lack of a statutory foundation means that crypto firms and investors may face ongoing uncertainty.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The shift from legislation to agency rulemaking creates regulatory uncertainty for crypto businesses and investors, as agency rules are easier to change or challenge in court.
  • Without a clear statutory framework, U.S. crypto markets may face inconsistent enforcement and a patchwork of rules across different agencies.
  • The move could affect global competitiveness, as other jurisdictions advance comprehensive crypto laws.

Background

The Clarity Act was introduced in the U.S. Congress as an attempt to bring legal certainty to cryptocurrency markets by defining which digital assets are securities, commodities, or currencies. The bill aimed to assign clear jurisdiction to regulators. However, it has been set aside, and agencies like the SEC are now developing their own regulatory frameworks. This pattern has been common in U.S. crypto policy, where legislative efforts have repeatedly stalled, leaving regulators to act on their own authority.

Key Perspectives

Crypto Industry: Many firms and advocates have pushed for a single, clear law to replace the current fragmented regulatory approach. They worry that agency rules may not provide the same level of certainty and could be reversed by future administrations. Regulators (SEC, CFTC, etc.): Agencies argue they cannot wait for Congress and must use existing authorities to protect investors and market integrity. They see rulemaking as a practical necessity. Critics/Skeptics: Some consumer advocates and lawmakers warn that agency rulemaking may exceed statutory authority, potentially leading to legal battles. Others argue that Congress must ultimately take responsibility for setting crypto policy.

What to Watch

  • Whether a new legislative effort emerges to replace the Clarity Act or codify some agency rules into law.
  • Legal challenges to agency rules, which could delay implementation or force changes.
  • The specific content of proposed agency regulations, particularly regarding definitions of securities and stablecoins.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workReport an errorSubscribe