Colombia peace tribunal charges 10 former FARC members with war crimes against Indigenous groups

Special Jurisdiction for Peace indicts ex-rebels for torture, murder and forced displacement spanning two decades

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Colombia's Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) on Tuesday indicted 10 former members of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity for systematic abuses against five Indigenous groups in the southeast of the country between 1996 and 2016.

The transitional justice tribunal, established to address atrocities committed during Colombia's decades-long civil conflict, accused the former rebels of torture, murder and forced displacement targeting Indigenous communities.

"Today we are delivering justice to the most forgotten peoples of a segregated Colombia," JEP magistrate Catalina Diaz said. She stated that FARC commanders had ordered subordinates to plant landmines on Indigenous territory and destroy ecosystems the tribes relied on for survival. "These people have had their basic right to exist compromised," Diaz added.

The indictment is the latest step in Colombia's effort to reckon with a conflict that lasted more than half a century. A 2022 report from Colombia's Truth Commission found that 450,664 people were killed between 1985 and 2018 as a result of the conflict, and 121,768 were forcibly disappeared.

Indigenous activists and community leaders welcomed the decision. Yhon Jairo Figueroa, a leader of the Koreguaje tribe, said: "For the first time, the Colombian state recognises that [armed groups] did not just kill individuals. But they attempted to kill the knowledge, the language, the territory."

Three of the accused are former members of the last secretariat of the FARC, which reached a peace agreement with the government in 2016. Indigenous communities continue to face violent attacks in Colombia today, amid ongoing fighting between remaining armed groups.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The charges represent a landmark recognition that crimes against Indigenous communities constitute attacks on cultural survival, not just individual harm.
  • The JEP's action reinforces Colombia's transitional justice framework, which seeks accountability without derailing the peace process.
  • Indigenous groups remain vulnerable to ongoing violence from other armed actors, making this indictment a potential precedent for future cases.

Background

Colombia's civil conflict pitted left-wing rebels, government forces, right-wing paramilitaries and criminal networks against each other for over five decades. The 2016 peace deal with the FARC led to the creation of the JEP as a special tribunal to investigate and prosecute the most serious crimes committed during the war. The body has the power to offer reduced sentences in exchange for truth-telling and reparations. Indigenous peoples were disproportionately affected by the conflict, with many communities caught in crossfire or deliberately targeted for their land and resources.

Key Perspectives

Indigenous communities: The charges are a historic acknowledgment of the systematic destruction of their ways of life, as expressed by Koreguaje leader Yhon Jairo Figueroa. FARC political party (Comunes): The former rebels have generally accepted JEP jurisdiction but may argue that the charges cover acts already addressed by the peace accord's amnesty provisions, though serious crimes like forced displacement is excluded from amnesty. Critics of the JEP: Some observers may view the slow pace of justice and the limited number of indictments after years of investigation, while others argue that the process is too lenient on commanders.

What to Watch

  • Whether the JEP will issue further indictments for crimes against other vulnerable groups, such as Afro-Colombian communities.
  • How the accused respond to the charges and whether they cooperate with the tribunal in exchange for lesser penalties.
  • The impact on ongoing violence: if the charges deter other armed groups or provoke retaliation against Indigenous leaders.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe