Former foster child's NDIS plan 'completely out of whack' as he struggles with independent living

19-year-old Coby, who has autism and intellectual disability, faces housing instability after child safety system failed to update his support plan for years

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
A 19-year-old former foster child with autism, ADHD and an intellectual disability says his National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) plan was not updated from age 10 to 17, leaving him without the independent living skills he now needs. Coby, who lives in a supported independent living house in Hobart, has been forced to contemplate moving four times this year and fears losing the support network he relies on.

Coby spends almost all of his time on his computer, either playing games or writing code. It is the only place where the 19-year-old feels safe and content. But while his computer skills improve rapidly, his independent living skills need work.

"I want to get more skills at cooking, money handling … I'm wasting my money on stupid things," he said.

Coby has level two autism, ADHD and an intellectual disability; he needs prompting to prepare food and take medication. He lived with foster carers until just before his 18th birthday, when he was relocated into a supported independent living house in suburban Hobart, where he lives with two others.

"I get the help and support that I need … I know most of the workers that come, I get along with them," Coby said.

But moving is something he has been forced to contemplate four times this year — including into public housing — at the suggestion of child safety. He now fears that if he leaves the house, he will not be allowed to return. So he stays at his computer.

Coby missed out on critical support to develop independent living skills as a teenager. It was the responsibility of Child Safety Services to ensure his NDIS plan included this as he prepared to transition to adulthood, but his plan changed very little from age 10 to 17. The NDIS plan is how these supports would have been funded.

Child safety workers and support staff recognised this issue in emails, seen by the ABC. One wrote: "I am sorry that [a review] has not occurred for three years … his needs would definitely be different to what they were three years ago."

Another stated: "The plan has been rolled over multiple times with limited updates, resulting in outdated goals and potentially misaligned funding allocations."

Resource constraints were also cited: "Unfortunately the ongoing lack of resourcing in [Child Safety Services] and [Out of Home Care] makes it very difficult for us to respond quickly … there are so many demands on our time."

His foster carers feared what would happen when Coby turned 18, after their calls for supports did not eventuate. They received a government form stating the department would no longer be his legal guardian and "does not have any legal responsibility for the young adult."

Coby was moved into supported independent living, but his housing issues continued. While waiting to see if his new arrangement would get NDIS funding and approval, he started to receive offers of other housing, with a case manager even raising "couch surfing" as an option.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Highlights systemic failures in preparing foster children with disabilities for adulthood, exposing gaps between policy and implementation.
  • Raises questions about resource constraints in child safety services and the NDIS, affecting vulnerable young people transitioning from care.
  • May prompt scrutiny of how NDIS plans are reviewed and updated for children in out-of-home care.

Background

The NDIS provides funding for supports for people with disability, and child safety services are responsible for ensuring children in care have appropriate plans. Critics have long warned about "cliff edges" when young people age out of care, where support drops sharply. Coby's case is an example of the gap between policy and implementation, with years of inaction despite acknowledged needs.

Key Perspectives

Coby and his foster carers: They repeatedly sought updates to his NDIS plan but were met with delays and acknowledgments of resource constraints. They fear for his future and have experienced housing instability. Child safety workers: Emails cited in the article admit the plan was outdated and that resourcing limits their ability to respond quickly. They noted that proactive support for carers has been scarce. Critics of the system: Structural failures are evident, with case managers even suggesting "couch surfing" as a housing option, indicating a lack of adequate alternatives.

What to Watch

  • Whether Coby's current supported independent living arrangement secures ongoing NDIS funding and provider approval.
  • Potential policy responses or reviews into NDIS planning and transition supports for children in care.
  • Similar cases may emerge as more young people approach transition age, increasing pressure on the system.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.