Greens split over Ukraine military aid as senator breaks ranks

Sarah Hanson-Young voices support for arming Ukraine, contradicting new leader David Shoebridge

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A split has emerged within the Australian Greens over military aid to Ukraine, with senator Sarah Hanson-Young breaking ranks to support arming the Ukrainian army while new party leader David Shoebridge has explicitly opposed such assistance. The division became public after Shoebridge held a tense meeting with Ukrainian-Australian community leaders on Friday.

Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who lost the party leadership contest to David Shoebridge earlier this month, said she supported providing military aid to Ukraine if necessary to protect its sovereignty.

"If that's the support that people need in order to defend themselves from the invasion of Russia, I think Australians need to support that," she told the ABC's 7.30 program. "We always come from a position of wanting to de-escalate military violence ... we want to see humanitarian support, we want to see diplomatic support, but of course you can't allow people to be left fending for themselves."

Hanson-Young said she had raised the issue directly with Shoebridge. The new leader had shocked Ukrainian-Australian community representatives in an earlier interview with this masthead by explicitly opposing military assistance to Ukraine.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong accused Shoebridge of "lining up with One Nation and President Putin" by opposing military aid in a fiery exchange in the Senate on Tuesday.

While Shoebridge insisted the party's position has been "clear from day one", parliamentary records show the Greens voted for a 2022 Senate motion supporting military aid to Ukraine after Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion. Shoebridge has noted that party positions can be amended at the will of its members, leaving open the possibility of change.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Greens are a minor party that often holds the balance of power in the Senate; their position on Ukraine military aid could influence future government legislation.
  • The public split between the new leader and a prominent senator signals internal tensions that may define Shoebridge's leadership.
  • Australia has been a significant donor of military aid to Ukraine; any shift in the Greens' stance could affect political consensus on continued support.

Background

The Greens have historically been a party of pacifism and disarmament, but in 2022 they voted for a Senate motion supporting military aid to Ukraine. David Shoebridge became party leader earlier this month, defeating Sarah Hanson-Young, and has since adopted a more explicitly anti-military-aid position, aligning with some populist and far-right parties. The change has caused friction both within the party and with the Ukrainian-Australian community.

Key Perspectives

David Shoebridge (Greens leader): Opposes providing weapons to Ukraine, arguing the party's opposition has been "clear from day one" and that the party should pursue humanitarian and diplomatic support instead. Sarah Hanson-Young (Greens senator): Supports military aid if needed for Ukraine to defend itself against Russian invasion, while still advocating de-escalation and humanitarian assistance. Critics/Skeptics: Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Ukrainian-Australian community leaders argue that opposing military aid aligns the Greens with One Nation and President Putin, and contradicts Australia's bipartisan support for Ukraine's self-defence.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Greens membership votes to amend the party's position on military aid in light of the internal split.
  • Any upcoming Senate motions on Ukraine aid and how the Greens vote as a bloc.
  • Shoebridge's ability to maintain party unity ahead of the next federal election.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe