The Trump administration first targeted ICC prosecutors and judges in February 2025 before announcing blanket sanctions on Oct. 9 this year. The measures are set to take full effect in April 2026. While the European Union has repeatedly backed the court against Washington, it has resisted activating a so-called blocking statute that would forbid EU firms from complying with U.S. sanctions laws.
Zavala Giler said the Commission's 'lack of clarity' left private companies and non-governmental organisations unsure whether they should comply with U.S. sanctions and what risks they faced if they did not. The call adds to pressure from EU lawmakers for a swift response after the Oct. 9 announcement. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas told the European Parliament on Tuesday that Brussels would use the next few months 'to open dialogue' on the issue.
'What I would hope is that the space for dialogue is not interpreted as a space for waiting to protect the court,' Zavala Giler said, speaking on the eve of a visit by Kallas to the court's headquarters.
The court has spent six months moving away from U.S. technology providers to an open-source software environment, and 20 months making its financial transactions 'dollar-proof.' That meant ensuring no U.S. person, bank or currency was involved in any payment. 'We made all of our staff members have European bank accounts. It was a very detailed process that we had to do, person by person, company by company, making sure that the contracts were in euros,' Zavala Giler said. The court also reduced the number of banks it works with to only a few, since few institutions are comfortable handling dollar-proof transactions.
Zavala Giler described the current sanctions carveout for telecommunications as 'a sort of Damocles sword on top of our head that could be revoked at any time.' He added: 'I cannot count on U.S. tech companies anymore.'
The registrar said the situation was likely to worsen without clear guidance from EU countries and the Commission. 'If the International Criminal Court cannot transact in Europe, in euros within the SEPA zone with no U.S. nexus, then there is a bigger question about European financial sovereignty,' he said.
The court has long called on the EU to use a blocking statute. The European Parliament, which awarded the court its human rights Sakharov Prize on Thursday, has backed the request. So far, the Commission has taken a cautious approach, choosing dialogue with the U.S. as a way of 'buying time,' as an EU diplomat put it. At their summit last week, EU heads of state and government backed Brussels' diplomatic effort while also committing to support the court.
As an intermediate step, Zavala Giler suggested the use of 'comfort letters' reassuring firms they should not comply with the U.S. measures. He stressed that uncertainty had already created 'an enormous chilling effect' on NGOs that work with the court on victim reparations and assistance. 'They don't know if they have the legal protections or not, to continue supporting the work of the court,' he said.
The registrar's office overlooks the court's compound, where the trial of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte over alleged crimes against humanity is due to begin next month.