India calls Vance's 'indentured servants' remark 'deeply offensive' as US suspends tech firms from visa program

US targets Microsoft, Adobe, and Indian IT giants in immigration crackdown

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
India has condemned comments by US Vice President JD Vance as 'deeply offensive' after he described Indian workers on H-1B visas as 'foreign indentured servants,' while the Trump administration suspended several major technology companies from a key permanent residency program.

In a statement published Friday, India's Ministry of External Affairs accused Vance of using language that carries 'painful historical and colonial legacy connotations.' The ministry said Indian professionals in the United States are 'highly educated and skilled contributors to its economy and innovation ecosystem,' and that the suspensions announced by the US 'do not advance the shared ambitions of both countries.'

Vance made the remarks Thursday as the US Department of Labor announced the suspension of Microsoft, Adobe and several large Indian IT firms — including Cognizant, Infosys, Capgemini, Tata Consultancy Services, Wipro and HCL — from the Permanent Labor Certification (PERM) program. The suspension prevents these companies from applying for permanent residency for employees on H-1B visas. Vance accused Microsoft of replacing 6,000 laid-off workers with people on H-1B visas, adding that companies 'cannot lay off American workers and then replace them with foreign indentured servants.'

According to official US data, about 70% of H-1B beneficiaries in 2025 were born in India. The Indian foreign ministry noted that existing H-1B visas and the status of current holders and their dependents would not be affected.

Industry body NASSCOM said Indian technology companies have 'significantly reduced their dependence on H-1B visas over the last few years' and are expanding domestic hiring in the US. Vance's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The dispute highlights growing tensions over skilled migration between two key strategic partners, potentially affecting technology cooperation and trade.
  • Indian IT firms are major employers in the US, and the suspension could disrupt their ability to retain talent and fulfil contracts.
  • The rhetoric around 'indentured servants' may inflame diplomatic relations and domestic political debate on both sides.

Background

The H-1B visa program allows US companies to employ foreign workers in specialised occupations. India has been the largest source of H-1B recipients for years, with Indian IT firms using the program to staff projects for American clients. The Trump administration has pursued stricter immigration policies, including greater scrutiny of visa programs. Vance, a prominent critic of what he calls 'uncontrolled immigration,' has targeted companies that utilise H-1B visas after layoffs.

Key Perspectives

[Indian Government]: Rejects Vance's characterisation as historically insensitive and insists Indian professionals add significant value to the US economy. Sees the suspension as counterproductive to shared economic goals. [Trump Administration/Vance]: Views the H-1B program as vulnerable to abuse by companies that prioritise cheaper foreign labour over American workers. The PERM suspension is presented as enforcement of existing law. [IT Industry (NASSCOM)]: Acknowledges past reliance on H-1B visas but argues that Indian firms have already shifted toward local hiring in the US, reducing dependency. Warns that punitive measures harm innovation.

What to Watch

  • Whether other US agencies follow with additional restrictions on H-1B processing or visa approvals.
  • India's next steps: possible diplomatic protests or reciprocal measures affecting US companies in India.
  • The outcome of the PERM suspensions: how long they last and whether they are challenged in court.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe