Israeli court orders timeline for return of Palestinians displaced from West Bank camps

Government ministers reject ruling as more than 33,000 await return to Jenin, Tulkarem and Nur Shams

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
The Israeli Supreme Court has ordered the government to provide a timeline for the return of Palestinians displaced from three northern West Bank refugee camps, setting November 23 as the deadline for a response. More than 33,000 people remain forcibly displaced from Jenin, Tulkarem and Nur Shams camps, and two senior ministers have publicly rejected the ruling.

The court's order, issued on Sunday, asks the government to set out when residents of the three camps can go back. The camps were emptied during a military operation called "Iron Wall", launched on January 21, 2025, initially at Jenin and expanded a week later to Tulkarem and Nur Shams. The United Nations says Israeli forces forcibly displaced the entire populations of the camps in January and February 2025 and continue to prevent their return.

Data from UNRWA, cited in a report on the destruction of Palestinian refugee camps in the northern West Bank, put the number of people still displaced at 33,362. By October 2025, 52 percent of structures in Jenin camp, 48 percent in Nur Shams and 36 percent in Tulkarem had been destroyed or damaged. Hundreds of homes, roads and infrastructure, including water and electricity networks, were affected, and humanitarian aid to the camps has been cut off. The report said Israeli forces killed 102 Palestinians, including 21 children, in the camps during the period covered, accounting for 46 percent of all Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in the West Bank in that time.

The ruling has drawn immediate opposition from within the government. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich rejected it, warning that the return of residents could allow the reconstruction of what he termed "terror infrastructure", and called on the government not to implement the decision. Defence Minister Israel Katz also opposed the court's intervention, asserting that the army's continued presence in the camps was a security decision and stating his intention to maintain a military presence there.

Among those waiting is Fuad Abu Salam, 42, a greenhouse installer who lived with his extended family in a two-storey building of four 300-square-metre apartments in Tulkarem camp. He now shares a rented flat of no more than 100 square metres in the Thinnabeh suburb with his wife, four children and mother, and spends his mornings gazing at the camp in the distance, where his home was partially destroyed when he left. He and his neighbours carried with them the hope of returning home.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The ruling is the first legal pressure on the Israeli government to set a concrete timeline for the return of more than 33,000 displaced Palestinians, and could shape how the camps' future is handled.
  • A public confrontation is building between the Israeli judiciary and senior government figures over a military policy the court has been asked to review.
  • The scale of destruction recorded in the camps means any return would require large-scale reconstruction, while aid access has been cut off.

Background

The three camps were established to house Palestinian refugees and their descendants, and have long been centres of Palestinian life in the northern West Bank. The "Iron Wall" operation, launched in January 2025, emptied them within weeks, and the UN has documented widespread destruction of homes, roads and utility networks. The government's stated position, reflected in the ministers' objections, is that the military presence in the camps is a security necessity. The Supreme Court has now asked the government to respond with a timeline by November 23.

Key Perspectives

Displaced residents: Families such as Fuad Abu Salam's are living in cramped rented housing or with relatives, watching their damaged and partly demolished camps from a distance while waiting for permission to return. Israeli government ministers: Smotrich argues that allowing residents back could permit the rebuilding of "terror infrastructure" and wants the ruling ignored; Katz treats the army's deployment as a security decision outside the court's remit. The court and the UN: The Supreme Court is pressing for a defined timetable for return, while the UN and UNRWA continue to document displacement, destruction and the cutoff of humanitarian aid.

What to Watch

  • Whether the government files a timeline by November 23, seeks to challenge the order, or refuses to comply.
  • Any change in the military presence in the three camps, which Katz has said he intends to maintain.
  • Signs of reconstruction planning or renewed aid access if residents are permitted to go back.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe