Macarthur Solar collapse leaves customers out of pocket as NSW investigates deposits

Customers paid up to 50 per cent upfront for solar batteries that were never installed; liquidator report reveals $3.4 million owed to creditors

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
The collapse of Macarthur Energy, trading as Macarthur Solar, has left more than a dozen customers fearing they have lost deposits of up to $17,600 for solar battery systems that were never installed, as the New South Wales Building Commission investigates over 100 complaints about the company's practices.

Macarthur Solar's underlying company, Macarthur Energy, has gone into liquidation, according to a report from liquidator Daniel Soire of Jones Partners. The company owes almost $3.4 million to more than 79 unsecured creditors, including former customers and suppliers, and more than $420,000 to 16 former employees in superannuation, annual leave and redundancy payments.

The ABC spoke to eight customers who fear they lost large deposits for solar and battery installations that never arrived. Among them is Murray Wylie, who paid a $5,000 deposit in February. After repeated reassurances from the company, he drove to Macarthur's south-west Sydney office in late August to find it locked and deserted. "I was angry because the thoughts that were building up had come true. I wasn't going to get my battery," he said. "You feel like you're being ripped off."

Mark Barnes paid a $6,500 deposit that he fears he will not get back. "We signed a contract in good faith and got nothing," he said. Mr Barnes, a retiree on a part-pension, has since paid another installer for solar panels and a battery, meaning he has paid twice.

The failed company was founded in 2015 by local electrician Mathew Cox. Many customers signed up after being attracted by the federal Cheaper Home Batteries Program (CHBP), a generous subsidy that has sparked unprecedented demand. Since July 2025, more than 530,000 batteries have been installed at an estimated cost of more than $7.2 billion over four years.

Macarthur's customers were charged 50 per cent up-front deposits, far above what is considered industry standard. New South Wales home building laws limit deposits to 10 per cent, and leading solar and consumer advocates say the higher deposits may have breached those laws. The state's Building Commission has confirmed it is investigating after receiving more than 100 complaints.

Andy Kelly, Choice's director of consumer impact, said the current system is absolutely failing consumers. Solar and consumer advocates say Macarthur Solar's collapse highlights glaring holes in protections for customers.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Households relying on the federal Cheaper Home Batteries Program face financial risk if installers collapse after taking large deposits.
  • The case may prompt stricter regulation of deposit limits and licensing for solar battery installers across Australia.
  • Affected customers, including retirees, are left with significant out-of-pocket losses and little recourse as unsecured creditors.

Background

Macarthur Solar was a Sydney-based solar and battery installer operating since 2015. The federal Cheaper Home Batteries Program, launched in July 2025, offers generous subsidies to encourage home battery uptake. The program drove a surge in demand, leading to rapid industry growth and, critics say, insufficient consumer protection for up-front payments. New South Wales building laws generally cap deposits at 10 per cent for residential building work, but the rules governing solar battery installations have been unclear.

Key Perspectives

Affected customers: They paid significant deposits (50 per cent upfront) for systems that were never delivered and now face losing that money as unsecured creditors in the liquidation. Consumer advocates (Choice): They argue the current system fails consumers by allowing excessive deposits and providing insufficient oversight of installers receiving government-subsidised work. Regulators (NSW Building Commission): They have opened an investigation into the company's deposit practices, which may lead to enforcement action or tighter rules.

What to Watch

  • The outcome of the NSW Building Commission investigation and any potential penalties or regulatory changes.
  • Whether liquidators recover funds for creditors or if customers and employees remain unpaid.
  • Renewed calls for reforms to deposit protections under the Cheaper Home Batteries Program.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.