MSWA to end home care for 75 clients, citing aged care reform costs

People with multiple sclerosis face doubled hourly rates as non-profit exits Support at Home program

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A Western Australian non-profit is ending its Commonwealth-funded home care services for 75 clients, including people with multiple sclerosis, saying federal aged care changes made the program financially unsustainable. Affected clients now face finding new providers at roughly double the hourly rate.

An 80-year-old Perth woman with multiple sclerosis is among 75 clients who will lose their home care services after MSWA said it could no longer afford to run the Commonwealth-funded Support at Home program.

Marlene Robinson, a former City of Bayswater councillor and staffer to former Western Australia Premier Geoff Gallop, has lived with MS for 30 years. She has no movement in her legs and limited use of her arms, and depends on support workers for essential personal care such as being helped out of bed to shower and dress.

"I can't do that myself, the arms aren't working too well," Ms Robinson said.

Her husband, former anthropologist Michael Robinson, 86, said the care met their basic daily needs. "Whereas if we were just doing it on our own, we probably couldn't do it," he said.

The couple recently received a letter from MSWA telling them the organisation would stop providing Support at Home services, which are designed to help older people remain at home rather than move into residential aged care. Sixteen of the affected clients live in regional areas.

MSWA said the federal government's aged care changes last year, which replaced the Home Care Packages program with Support at Home, had excessively increased costs and administrative burden to unsustainable levels. Chief executive Melanie Kiely said the program brought in "a lot more administration, a lot more regulation".

"We understand the pain of this and that is something we want to work with (clients) to transition," she said. "Having said that we've kept our prices down so low for so long and we just cannot do it sustainably any longer."

MSWA charges $60 an hour for weekday personal care, half the market average of $125 an hour, meaning clients face a doubling of the hourly rate. Ms Robinson said she would be able to afford much less care for her basic needs.

"I don't know what I'll do without it," she said. "When I think about it, I sort of stop. I can't think about the horrific future."

MSWA said it was not abandoning its clients and would continue providing specialist neurological services.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • 75 older people with disabilities, including 16 in regional WA, must find new care providers and face roughly double the current hourly rate for personal care.
  • The case highlights how the federal transition from Home Care Packages to Support at Home is affecting smaller specialist providers.
  • For clients like Marlene Robinson, the loss of subsidised care could determine whether they stay at home or move into residential aged care.

Background

The federal government replaced the Home Care Packages program with Support at Home last year as part of a broader aged care overhaul. The new program is intended to help older people stay in their own homes for longer. MSWA is a Western Australian non-profit that supports people with multiple sclerosis and other neurological conditions, and has historically charged well below market rates for personal care.

Key Perspectives

MSWA clients: For people like the Robinsons, the service is essential to basic daily living. They face the prospect of less care at a higher price, or being unable to afford adequate support.

MSWA: The organisation says it kept prices low for years but can no longer sustain the program under the new regulatory and administrative requirements. It says it will help clients transition while continuing its specialist neurological services.

Critics and observers: The wider question raised by the case is whether the federal program's design puts specialist community providers at a disadvantage, and whether transition support for vulnerable clients will be enough.

What to Watch

  • Whether all 75 clients secure alternative providers before MSWA exits the program.
  • Any further exits by specialist or community aged care providers under the Support at Home model.
  • The federal government's response to complaints about the administrative burden of the new program.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.