The discussions were first reported by Tim Culpan's Culpium newsletter on Friday. Under the arrangement Culpan considers most probable, sometimes described as "Plan A," TSMC would own and operate the new facility while SpaceX or Terafab could invest in the venture, commit to buying a guaranteed volume of chips, or combine both approaches. The exact ownership structure remains under discussion.
A second option, "Plan B," would give SpaceX majority ownership of Terafab, with TSMC investing less but providing operational expertise and process technology. Culpan notes that Plan A would resemble TSMC's JASM and ESMC joint ventures in Japan and Germany, where local partners provide capital and demand while TSMC contributes technology and runs the fabs. Plan B would be a new model for TSMC. The report also ties TSMC's rumored plans to build a fab complex in Texas to its efforts to support Terafab.
Both structures remain speculative, and the newsletter acknowledges other options may exist. Since nothing is official, "Plan A" and "Plan B" should be considered possibilities rather than confirmed choices, with potential "Plan C," "Plan D" or "Plan E" still in play.
The development raises questions about Intel's previously reported role in Terafab. Intel is currently expected to supply its 1.4nm-class 14A process technology for chips made for SpaceX, Tesla and xAI. If TSMC joins the project, Intel's 14A could be dropped in favour of a TSMC node. TSMC is also a leading advanced packaging supplier, which could matter if Terafab chips are made and packaged in Texas.
There is also a patent consideration: Intel has a broad cross-patent license agreement with TSMC, but Terafab does not. Producing chips using an Intel-developed node could potentially infringe TSMC patents, which may be one reason Musk needs to keep TSMC close to the project.