One-draw posterior updates achieve multi-sample reasoning gains at reduced cost

Fenchel-Bregman IVON (FBI) trains a posterior over solver parameters using a single sample per update, matching Pass@10 of a K-draw baseline with 12.3% of the training time

Research Lab
Sungjun Lim · Adrian Robert Minut · Nico Carlsen Daheim · Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan · Kyungwoo Song · Thomas Möllenhoff

RIKEN AIP · Yonsei University · Sapienza University of Rome · TU Darmstadt · Hessian.AI

Research Digest··3 min read
The authors formulate finite-K posterior learning to directly optimize candidate coverage in multi-sample reasoning.

, maximize candidate coverage (Pass@K).

Why this paper

From RIKEN AIP and 4 others

In one line

Training a posterior over solver parameters with Fenchel-Bregman updates improves multi-sample reasoning coverage while needing only one posterior draw per update.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors (2 noted)
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe