PAC warns UK government's AI ambitions undermined by aging IT and skills gap

Public Accounts Committee chair says Whitehall 'not prepared' for AI tsunami as fraud costs billions

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
The UK government is pressing ahead with artificial intelligence ambitions despite failing to replace aging IT systems that expose departments to cyberattacks and fraud, according to a damning report from Parliament's spending watchdog. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, warned that Whitehall lacks the digital skills and urgency needed to tackle the challenge.

In his second annual report, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said AI is approaching government "like a tsunami" and he remains sceptical that ministers are prepared for the enormity of the challenge. The Conservative MP noted that announced reforms to improve digital capability have not been backed by a plan to close the civil service's skills gap.

Just six per cent of civil servants work in digital and data roles, well short of the government's ten per cent target, and the report warns that senior specialists are particularly scarce. The committee said meeting the target will require significant recruitment and retention.

The report highlights the risk posed by legacy IT systems, calling the government's lack of urgency "worrying." It states that these aging systems create cybersecurity risks and prevent departments from reaping the benefits of new technologies, including AI.

Fraud and error already cost taxpayers an estimated £55 billion to £81 billion annually, according to figures cited by the PAC. The Department for Work and Pensions overpaid £9.9 billion in benefits through fraud and error in 2025-26, equivalent to 3.2 per cent of its spending. Its plan is to reduce that to 2.8 per cent by 2028-29, but Clifton-Brown noted that even then billions would still be lost.

At the Home Office, years of asylum backlogs and mounting costs have prompted what the report calls "counterproductive quick fixes." The Home Office and Ministry of Justice spent around £4.9 billion on asylum in 2024-25, and ministers have promised an entirely new system without explaining how it will work. Digital rights campaigners at Open Rights Group have called for the Home Office to scrap its AI asylum tools over concerns about accuracy, transparency and human oversight.

The report also points to a troubled IT modernisation project at National Savings & Investments (NS&I). Begun in 2020, the project's price tag had reached £3 billion by December 2024 — £1.3 billion more than first expected. The project has been rated red since 2022-23, meaning successful delivery is unlikely, and NS&I could not provide MPs with an up-to-date spending figure or a realistic completion date.

By contrast, the Bank of England successfully overhauled its Real-Time Gross Settlement system for £431 million, completing the work in April 2025. The PAC directed its recommendations at Whitehall, suggesting ministers could learn from the Bank's approach.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Taxpayers are losing tens of billions annually to fraud and error that better technology could help prevent.
  • Aging IT systems make government departments more vulnerable to cyberattacks, including those powered by AI.
  • The government's AI push risks being ineffective or unsafe if the underlying digital infrastructure and workforce are not modernised first.

Background

The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee regularly scrutinises government spending and project delivery. Its chair, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, has previously warned about Whitehall's digital shortcomings. The UK government has set a target of having 10 per cent of civil servants in digital and data roles and has announced various reforms to improve digital capability, but critics say progress has been too slow. Major IT projects in government have a history of delays and cost overruns, as illustrated by the NS&I modernisation.

Key Perspectives

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown and the PAC: They argue that the government is not moving fast enough on legacy IT and digital skills, and that AI adoption without fixing fundamentals will leave departments exposed. Government departments: The Department for Work and Pensions and the Home Office are attempting to reduce fraud and improve systems, but their plans have been criticised as insufficient. Ministers have promised reforms without detailing how they will work. Digital rights and transparency campaigners: Groups such as the Open Rights Group want the Home Office to scrap AI asylum tools, citing accuracy and oversight concerns.

What to Watch

  • Whether the government publishes a clear timetable for closing the digital skills gap and reaching the 10 per cent target.
  • The outcome of the NS&I IT modernisation project, which remains rated red and could require further write-downs.
  • Any announcement from the Home Office detailing how its new asylum system will operate and whether it will continue using AI tools.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe