Palantir and London Mayor Sadiq Khan drop legal fight over Met police contract

US tech firm and mayor's office withdraw allegations, avert high court trial set for January

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time3 min
Sources2 outlets
Palantir and London Mayor Sadiq Khan have called off their legal battle over claims the Labour mayor was blocking the US tech company from signing a £50m contract with the Metropolitan Police. Both sides announced on Wednesday they had withdrawn allegations against each other, heading off a high court trial scheduled for January.

The dispute began in May when Khan stepped in to block the Met from awarding Palantir a two-year, £50m deal for Scotland Yard to use AI to process intelligence in criminal investigations, in a system called unified operational analytics (UOA). Khan cited a "clear and serious breach" of procurement rules.

Palantir sued the mayor's office for policing and crime (Mopac) in June. The company, which also works for the Israeli military and the Trump administration in its immigration crackdown, faced criticism from Khan, who had previously said Londoners only wanted public money going to companies that "share the values of our city".

Louis Mosley, who heads Palantir in the UK and Europe, responded by accusing Khan of politicising procurement and said he was "putting politics above public safety". He said: "What Londoners value is not being mugged, not being raped by a serving police officer."

The agreement to drop the claims comes a month after Palantir hired Tom Watson, the former Labour party deputy leader, as a full-time lobbyist. The firm was concerned that if public authorities could block it from winning contracts due to objections over the values of its senior leadership, it would undermine its ability to operate in the UK.

Palantir is also facing a battle to retain its £330m NHS medical data contract amid a vociferous campaign from parts of the public and some MPs for it to be replaced by a less controversial company.

In a joint statement, Palantir and Mopac said Mopac's decision in May to block the contract "was not based on Palantir's values or ethics or any wider reporting about the company". The statement added: "Mopac recognises Palantir's concerns that media reporting of a statement from the mayor's spokesperson before the decision was taken could have incorrectly created the impression that an assessment of the company's values had been a factor in that decision." It said Mopac's consideration was based on its statutory role of examining spend proposals against legal tests and guidance on procurement, governance, affordability and value for money.

Khan said: "London is the technology capital of Europe, and I am proud that leading software firms choose the city as their home. Palantir makes a significant contribution to jobs and investment in the capital, employing a large number of Londoners whose services have been procured legally by organisations across the UK and beyond."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The resolution allows the Met to potentially proceed with using Palantir's AI system for criminal investigations, affecting policing efficiency in London.
  • It sets a precedent for how public authorities can consider a contractor's ethics and values in procurement decisions, a debate that will continue.
  • Palantir's wider UK business, including its £330m NHS contract, remains under scrutiny; the outcome here may influence that campaign.

Background

Palantir, a US data analytics company known for work with intelligence and military agencies, has faced growing controversy over its contracts with UK public bodies. The firm already provides services to the Metropolitan Police under a separate contract. In May, Mayor Khan intervened to block a new £50m deal for AI-based intelligence processing, prompting Palantir to sue the mayor's office. The company hired former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson as a lobbyist in September amid concerns about its ability to win UK public contracts.

Key Perspectives

Palantir: Argues its technology improves public safety and that blocking contracts due to leadership values politicises procurement. Louis Mosley said the mayor was "putting politics above public safety". Mayor's Office/Mopac: Maintains its decision was purely based on procurement rules and value for money, not on ethics. The joint statement explicitly says values and ethics were not factors. Critics/Skeptics: Campaigners and some MPs have questioned Palantir's suitability for public contracts given its work with controversial clients. The joint statement's wording may not fully satisfy those who believe the mayor's initial concerns were valid.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Met now moves forward with the £50m unified operational analytics contract with Palantir.
  • The fate of Palantir's NHS medical data contract, worth £330m, which remains under public and political pressure.
  • Any further legal or regulatory challenges to Palantir's UK operations from campaign groups or MPs.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe