The Independent Report on Paramilitary Group Transition to Disbandment, released on Tuesday, recommends establishing a structured process to wind up residual paramilitary structures that have persisted since the 1998 Good Friday agreement. The agreement was expected to see these groups fade, but some evolved into criminal enterprises involved in drug dealing, extortion and coercive control.
Fleur Ravensbergen, a lecturer in conflict resolution and governance at the University of Amsterdam, said she found "significant willingness to engage" among paramilitaries during a year-long scoping exercise. Presenting the report in Belfast, she stated: "I have concluded that there is sufficient merit in and support for a formal process of paramilitary group transition."
Ravensbergen noted that there was "limited support for the term 'disbandment' as the endpoint of a transition process" but added that objections appeared to be about wording rather than outcomes. "I believe that the risks of the persistence of paramilitary structures, continued drift and unmanaged fragmentation outweigh the risks associated with attempting a structured and time-bound transition process," she said. "Inaction is not a neutral option."
Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Bryant thanked Ravensbergen and said the government was committed to ending paramilitarism. "While these groups may pose as protectors of their communities, they are largely engaged in criminality including drug dealing, extortion and intimidation, blighting the very communities they perversely claim to protect," Bryant said. He added that the government would consider the report and consult with Dublin before responding.
However, the report has drawn criticism from Naomi Long, Northern Ireland's justice minister and a member of the Alliance party. Long criticised Ravensbergen's appointment as an interlocutor last year, arguing that engagement with paramilitary and criminal groups risked granting them legitimacy. "The idea that paramilitary groups can transition into law-abiding entities has long since moved beyond the point of credibility," Long said at the time. "They cannot continue to be treated as if they are genuinely committed to reform – that moment passed long ago."
The report did not identify individuals or specific organisations, as discussions were held on a confidential basis. It noted that the nature and extent of paramilitary influence vary considerably between groups, communities and geographical areas.