Rewarding moral arguments makes a language model more consistent, not sounder

Self-judged reinforcement learning halved option-order sensitivity in one evaluation, but did not improve moral sycophancy and worsened other judgment measures.

Big Tech
Marius De Kuthy Meurers · Aaron Parisi · Bernd Bohnet

Google DeepMind

Research Digest··2 min read
De Kuthy Meurers and colleagues trained a language model to produce better moral arguments using rewards from its own comparisons of competing answers.

The authors trained a Gemma-4 4B model through reinforcement learning on dilemmas extracted from classic novels in the PG19 corpus.

§