Ryan dismisses Frydenberg abuse claims as book fuels Kooyong rematch speculation

Former treasurer accuses independent MP's supporters of personal vitriol; Ryan says he is focused on the past

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
Independent MP Monique Ryan has dismissed former Liberal treasurer Josh Frydenberg as dwelling on the past after he accused her supporters of waging a campaign thick with personal abuse during the 2022 election, as Liberal frontbenchers back him for a potential rematch in the Melbourne seat of Kooyong.

The exchange comes ahead of the launch of Frydenberg's memoir, "A Grateful Son", which has fuelled speculation he will again contest the inner-Melbourne seat he lost to Ryan four years ago as part of the teal wave that swept several Liberal strongholds.

In extracts provided to The Australian, Frydenberg said Ryan's campaign had promised a kinder style of politics but instead dialled the personal vitriol "up to 11". He claimed hundreds of his signs were defaced with swastikas, his staff were bullied at polling stations, and posters branding him a traitor were erected.

"It was the hypocrisy. Ryan's supporters piously committed to a kinder, gentler style of politics, even as they waged a campaign thick with personal abuse," Frydenberg wrote. "The proposition was not merely that they were right and we were wrong; it was that they were good and we were bad."

Ryan did not directly address the abuse allegations but said Frydenberg was focused on the past. She was targeted in the 2025 election cycle when an ex-Proud Boy heckled her, according to reports.

The political climate remains tense ahead of the next federal election, due before mid-2028, with threats against MPs at record levels and the 2025 vote subject to a coordinated disruption operation from far-right figures.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Kooyong seat is a bellwether for the strength of the teal independent movement, and a Frydenberg return would be one of the most closely watched contests at the next election.
  • The heated exchange underscores the deteriorating tone of political discourse, with security agencies having urged calm amid rising threats against politicians.
  • The outcome could help determine the balance of power in the House of Representatives and the Liberal Party's strategy for winning back moderate voters.

Background

Josh Frydenberg was Australia's treasurer under the Morrison government and was widely seen as a future Liberal leader before losing Kooyong to Monique Ryan in the 2022 election. Ryan was one of several "teal" independents who ran on a platform of integrity and climate action, unseating high-profile Liberal MPs in affluent urban seats. Frydenberg has remained in the public eye through business roles and now a memoir. Liberal frontbenchers have publicly backed him for a rematch.

Key Perspectives

Monique Ryan: Dismissed Frydenberg's complaints as backward-looking and declined to engage directly on the abuse allegations. She has herself been the target of harassment from far-right figures. Josh Frydenberg: Accuses Ryan's campaign of hypocrisy and says her supporters subjected him and his staff to personal abuse, vandalism and intimidation during the 2022 campaign. Liberal Party: Several frontbenchers are encouraging Frydenberg to run again, viewing him as a strong candidate to reclaim the seat and a unifying figure for the party's moderate wing. Critics and security agencies: Note that political threats and harassment have escalated since 2022, with the 2025 election targeted by far-right disruption, and urge all sides to lower tensions.

What to Watch

  • The launch of "A Grateful Son" and whether Frydenberg uses it to signal a formal candidacy.
  • Any further responses from Ryan or her former campaign team regarding the abuse claims.
  • Threat levels and security incidents ahead of the next election campaign, which could shape the tone of the contest.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe