Bambu Lab has stated it disagrees with the verdict and intends to seek post-trial review and appeal. The company told Tom's Hardware: "We appreciate the time and effort of the jury in considering this matter. While we respect the judicial process, we disagree with the verdict reached in this case."
The patents in dispute cover prime tower methods for purging single-nozzle filament and strain-gauge-based bed leveling. Both techniques are used in Bambu Lab's first-generation machines, including the retired X1, the P1S (nominally replaced by the P2S in October 2025), and the still-active A1 and A1 Mini.
Notably, the ruling applies only in the United States. In Europe, the Unified Patent Court's Hague Local Division dismissed a similar Stratasys action against Bambu Lab earlier this year. This means an X1-Carbon in New York would infringe the prime tower patent while the same machine in Germany would not.
Bambu Lab's newer H2 and X2 models use dual-nozzle heads and optical sensors, sidestepping the contested patents. An anonymous source indicated the company has been working on an alternative to prime towers, but no public details are available.
Prusa Research, another major 3D printing company, said its multi-nozzle INDX toolchanger avoids prime towers by design. A Prusa Research representative explained, "Our motivation was to have minimal waste. In our eyes, this is a better solution than a prime tower."