Tories overstated net zero cost by nearly £500bn after spreadsheet blunder

Conservative policy document used double-counted figure from Climate Change Committee data to justify scrapping 2050 emissions target

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
The Conservative Party's flagship policy document, released at the party's annual conference, overstated the cost of achieving net zero emissions by nearly £500bn after apparently double-counting figures from a spreadsheet produced by the government's climate advisory body. The error was identified by climate publication Carbon Brief and reported by the Guardian.

The document, titled The Right Way and introduced at the Conservative conference in Birmingham, was used by party leader Kemi Badenoch to justify the decision to scrap the UK's target of reaching net zero emissions by 2050, a commitment originally made under Theresa May. In a chapter on net zero, the document claimed that the Climate Change Committee (CCC) had estimated the cost of its net zero route at £957bn.

However, the actual figure from the CCC's Sixth Carbon Budget totals £478bn — half of what the Conservative document stated. The error appears to have occurred because the spreadsheet used by the Conservatives included both the individual column totals and the row showing overall sums, effectively doubling the number.

A spokesperson for the Climate Change Committee said: "We don't recognise this number. The committee has previously offered to meet with Ms Badenoch and talk her through our advice. That offer is, of course, still open."

The CCC's most recent analysis puts the expected cost of achieving net zero by 2050 at about £110bn over 30 years, roughly £4bn a year or 0.2% of GDP.

The erroneous figure appears to have been copied without independent verification. It had previously been published in a report by the Institute of Economic Affairs, a right-leaning thinktank, and in an article in The Spectator.

Badenoch, in a foreword to the 100-page document, noted that "as an engineer", she is used to correctly diagnosing issues so they can be addressed. The document is modelled on The Right Approach, a policy blueprint produced by Margaret Thatcher's Conservative Party in 1976.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The error raises questions about the Conservative Party's handling of climate policy and the reliability of the cost analysis used to justify abandoning a legally binding emissions target.
  • If the miscalculation goes uncorrected, it could mislead public debate about the affordability of net zero, potentially delaying action on climate change.
  • The incident may damage the party's credibility on economic competence, a key Conservative claim, especially as the error appears to have been avoidable.

Background

The UK's target of reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 was introduced under Prime Minister Theresa May in 2019, following advice from the Climate Change Committee. The CCC is an independent public body that advises the government on emissions targets and carbon budgets. Kemi Badenoch, who became Conservative leader in 2025, used the party's conference to announce that the party would abandon the 2050 target, arguing it would impose unacceptable costs on the economy. The Right Way was presented as a detailed policy alternative.

Key Perspectives

Conservative Party: The party justified scrapping the net zero target based on what it described as enormous estimated costs, citing the now-debunked £957bn figure. Badenoch has not yet publicly addressed the error. Climate Change Committee: The CCC disputes the number and has reiterated its offer to brief Badenoch directly. The committee's own analysis shows far lower costs, equivalent to 0.2% of GDP annually. Critics and climate analysts: Carbon Brief and other commentators point out that the double-counting is a basic spreadsheet mistake that undermines the credibility of the Conservative policy document. The error also raises concerns about the thinktank and media sources that originally propagated the inflated figure.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Conservative Party publicly corrects the document or acknowledges the mistake.
  • Any impact on Badenoch's leadership and the party's standing on climate policy ahead of the next general election.
  • Continued scrutiny of the Institute of Economic Affairs and other sources cited in the document for factual accuracy.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe