Fahnbulleh, who has set reducing bills as her top priority, has instructed officials in her department to examine an RBT model. The proposal is backed by the New Economics Foundation – the thinktank she used to lead – and by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, which argues that with £5bn of public money the government could fund an RBT that would deliver the largest bill reductions to low-income households.
Chancellor John Healey is expected to announce £1bn of extra winter support in this month’s budget, likely via the existing warm homes discount, which critics describe as a “clunky” mechanism. Longer-term options under discussion include a permanent cut to VAT on electricity, shifting green levies into general taxation, and a formal “social tariff” for energy.
However, the RBT proposal has its detractors. The Guardian’s Nils Pratley notes that there are “at least three reasons why an RBT has few fans”, though the full arguments were not detailed in the reporting. The idea would mark a significant departure from Britain’s current flat-rate energy pricing and would require careful design to avoid unintended incentives or administrative complexity.
The energy secretary has been blunt about her goal: “My mark of failure or success is whether I can get bills down or not. That’s the only thing I’m in this job to do.”