UK energy secretary leans towards rejecting Rosebank oilfield, approves Jackdaw gasfield

Miatta Fahnbulleh says each application judged on its merits, citing climate obligations and energy security

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time4 min
Sources2 outlets
UK Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh is leaning towards refusing approval for the giant Rosebank oilfield, according to officials, in what would be a major blow to the North Sea industry and a victory for climate campaigners, while she approved the smaller Jackdaw gasfield on Wednesday, arguing that the UK needs domestic gas during the energy transition.

Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh is likely to reject the Rosebank oilfield, sources say, a decision that would mark a significant shift in UK North Sea policy. The Guardian understands that officials believe she is minded to refuse the project, which would be one of the biggest oilfields in the North Sea.

Fahnbulleh approved the Jackdaw gasfield on Wednesday, prompting criticism from some environmental groups. However, she explained that the rationale for Jackdaw does not apply to Rosebank. "One is a gasfield that caters for the domestic market, while the other is an oilfield that is mainly for export," she said. "It is right that we judge each application in its own right, and it is absolutely critical that the decision is consistent with our climate obligations, our carbon budgets and the end destination we need to get to with the energy transition."

The Jackdaw field, due to begin producing gas within weeks, is expected to add 36 million tonnes of carbon emissions. Fahnbulleh said she is satisfied that Jackdaw does not violate the UK's climate commitments. "As we make the transition, we are going to need gas," she said during a visit to Aberdeen. "At a point when we have got conflict in the Middle East that is triggering an energy crisis, energy security is vital, and homegrown energy is key." She conceded the decision would not help reduce household energy bills, stating: "This is not about bills."

Rosebank would emit about seven times the carbon of Jackdaw and, officials say, would contribute less to UK energy security because most of its oil would be exported. A final ruling on Rosebank is expected later this year.

Neil McCulloch, chief executive of Adura, one of the companies behind Rosebank, expressed optimism about the project's prospects. "We've seen a decision made that there is a process that can result in a decision, but it's a matter for the secretary of state and her team to examine the two fields separately," he said. "But we believe we've done as good a job in arguing our case with Rosebank as we did with Jackdaw. Obviously, the economic benefits of Rosebank are different. It's a bigger field. It will last longer than Jackdaw, and so I'm sure she'll take that into account when she makes her decision in terms of the jobs and economic impact for the UK."

Fahnbulleh has promised that future North Sea tax revenues will be invested in a new energy wealth fund for green projects, with GBP 2 billion allocated in the upcoming budget. She said: "When we have tax revenues that are coming from the oil and gas industry, it is right that we invest that in the transition we need to make in energy." However, she did not specify which tax revenues would go to the fund or how much it might generate, saying the chancellor would provide details in the budget.

The Labour government's 2024 election manifesto pledged a ban on new drilling licences, but the companies behind Jackdaw and Rosebank sought approval for existing licences. A Savanta poll for climate group E3G, seen by the Guardian, found that nearly a third of voters would be less likely to vote Labour if it approved more North Sea drilling, including about a third of 2024 Labour voters and half of 18- to 24-year-olds.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The decision on Rosebank will set a precedent for how the UK government balances energy security, climate commitments, and the future of the North Sea oil and gas industry.
  • It affects Labour's political standing, particularly in Scotland and among younger voters, as the party navigates its 2024 manifesto pledge against calls from unions and industry for jobs and investment.
  • The outcome will influence the UK's ability to meet its carbon budgets and the global message it sends ahead of international climate talks.

Background

The UK North Sea has been a major source of oil and gas for decades, but production has declined and the government faces pressure to transition to net-zero emissions. Labour won the 2024 election on a platform that included a ban on new drilling licences. Companies with existing licences, however, can still seek environmental approvals for developments already awarded. The Jackdaw and Rosebank fields are among the largest proposed. The UN Environment Programme has called for global carbon emissions to fall by nearly a fifth by 2029 and close to half within a decade to avoid catastrophic climate change.

Key Perspectives

Government (Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh): Emphasizes a case-by-case approach, balancing climate obligations with the need for domestic gas during the transition. Approves Jackdaw on grounds of energy security but signals Rosebank may not pass the test due to its export focus and higher emissions. Plans a clean energy wealth fund from oil and gas revenues. Industry (Adura CEO Neil McCulloch): Argues that Rosebank's economic benefits, including jobs and longevity, should be weighed positively. Expresses confidence in the application process after Jackdaw's approval. Climate campaigners: View any new drilling as inconsistent with climate targets. The Jackdaw approval sparked protests, and a rejection of Rosebank would be seen as a major victory. A Savanta poll suggests significant voter opposition to more drilling, especially among younger and Labour-supporting voters.

What to Watch

  • The final decision on Rosebank, expected later this year.
  • Details of the energy wealth fund in the chancellor's budget, including which revenues will be allocated.
  • Political fallout in north-east Scotland, where the industry is based and unions are active, and among Labour MPs facing Green Party challenges.

Sources

Checked

12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 8 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedFahnbulleh is leaning towards refusing approval for Rosebank.World news | The Guardian: “Miatta Fahnbulleh is leaning towards rejecting the giant Rosebank oilfield, the Guardian understands”
  2. SupportedFahnbulleh approved Jackdaw on Wednesday.World news | The Guardian: “Fahnbulleh approved the smaller Jackdaw gasfield on Wednesday”
  3. Partly supportedThe possible Rosebank refusal would be a major blow to the North Sea industry.World news | The Guardian: “in what would be a blow for the North Sea energy industry and a major victory for climate campaigners”
  4. Not in the sourcesThe possible refusal would mark a significant shift in UK North Sea policy.
  5. SupportedFahnbulleh said, “One is a gasfield that caters for the domestic market, while the other is an oilfield that is mainly for export.”World news | The Guardian: ““One is a gasfield that caters for the domestic market, while the other is an oilfield that is mainly for export,” she said.”
  6. SupportedFahnbulleh said each application should be judged on its own and the decision must align with climate obligations and carbon budgets.World news | The Guardian: ““It is right that we judge each application in its own right, and it is absolutely critical that the decision is consistent with our climate obligations, our carbon budgets and the end destination we need to get to with the energy transition.””
  7. SupportedJackdaw is expected to add 36 million tonnes of carbon emissions.World news | The Guardian: “which is due to begin producing gas within weeks and will add an estimated 36m tonnes of carbon emissions”
  8. Partly supportedFahnbulleh said she is satisfied Jackdaw does not violate the UK’s climate commitments.World news | The Guardian: “Fahnbulleh said she had been satisfied that Jackdaw, which is due to begin producing gas within weeks and will add an estimated 36m tonnes of carbon emissions, would not violate the UK’s climate commitments.”
  9. Partly supportedOfficials say Rosebank would contribute less to UK energy security because most of its oil would be exported.World news | The Guardian: “Fahnbulleh is understood to believe that it would do less for UK energy security, given most of the oil would be exported.”
  10. SupportedRosebank would emit about seven times the carbon of Jackdaw.World news | The Guardian: “The field would emit about seven times the carbon of Jackdaw”
  11. SupportedA final ruling on Rosebank is expected later this year.World news | The Guardian: “Officials say Fahnbulleh has not yet taken a final decision on Rosebank, but a ruling is expected later this year.”
  12. SupportedThe new energy wealth fund will receive £2 billion in the budget.World news | The Guardian: “The fund will be given £2bn in the budget, she said”

Zotpaper

Written by June Katz on the World desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source8 of 12 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe