Ukraine ambassador urges Greens to rethink military aid stance as Labor and Coalition attack

New Greens leader David Shoebridge says Australia should only send weapons if UN Security Council approves, a move Russia could veto

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
Ukraine's ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, has called on the Greens to reconsider their opposition to providing military aid against Russia's invasion, as the major parties accuse the party of naively aiding Vladimir Putin. The peak Ukrainian-Australian community body is urgently seeking a meeting with new Greens leader David Shoebridge.

Myroshnychenko said he was concerned the Greens' position "does not appear to distinguish between offensive wars of choice, aggression and territorial expansion versus wars of desperate defence and national survival." Pointing to Russia's socially conservative policies, he said: "I cannot believe, then, that the Greens actively seek an outcome where President Putin's policies are imposed on Ukrainian society."

The ambassador noted that Ukraine had surrendered its nuclear weapons and never engaged in military adventurism, in line with Greens principles, yet Russia launched an unprovoked invasion. "Ukraine cannot survive or defend itself without meaningful collective security support from other democracies," he said.

Shoebridge, who became Greens leader recently, told this masthead the party does not support Australia sending weapons and other military equipment to Ukraine. He said Australia should not provide direct military assistance unless the United Nations Security Council backed such transfers, a move Russia could veto as a permanent council member.

Labor and the Coalition have criticised the Greens' stance as naive and argued it would help Putin. The Ukrainian-Australian community body is seeking an urgent meeting with Shoebridge to express its concerns.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Greens' position could shift the debate on Australia's military aid to Ukraine, a key foreign policy issue for the government.
  • It puts the party at odds with the Ukrainian-Australian community and the bipartisan consensus supporting arms deliveries.
  • The outcome may affect Australia's standing among allies and Ukraine's ability to sustain its defence effort.

Background

The Greens have long held anti-war and anti-military aid positions, favouring diplomatic solutions. Shoebridge's stance follows that tradition but has drawn strong criticism since Russia's invasion, which most Western nations have met with military support for Ukraine. The party's position contrasts with Labor and the Coalition, which both support arms transfers to Kyiv.

Key Perspectives

Ukrainian Ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko: Argues the Greens fail to distinguish between aggressive wars and defensive ones, and that Ukraine has a UN-recognised right to self-defence. He warns that withholding aid would allow Russia to impose its policies on Ukraine. Greens Leader David Shoebridge: Maintains that Australia should only provide direct military assistance if the UN Security Council authorises it, a threshold Russia can block. The party opposes sending weapons. Labor and the Coalition: Accuse the Greens of naivety and effectively aiding Putin by opposing arms for Ukraine. They support continued military aid.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Ukrainian-Australian community secures a meeting with Shoebridge and what comes of it.
  • Any shift in Greens policy or public statements following the backlash.
  • The government's next aid package decision and how the Greens respond in parliament.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.