Sunday 4 October 2026
Afternoon EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Geopolitics

UN experts find grounds to believe US committed war crimes in Iran strikes

Report also accuses Iranian authorities of crimes against humanity in crackdown on protests

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A United Nations fact-finding mission has concluded there are reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed war crimes in two missile strikes in Iran that killed at least 177 civilians, while also finding that Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity during a crackdown on mass protests. The strikes hit a primary school in Minab and a sports complex in Lamerd in February.

The Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran released its report on Thursday, stating that the US strikes on the Shajareh Tayyebeh Primary School in Minab and a sports complex in Lamerd were indiscriminate attacks that caused civilian deaths and damage to civilian infrastructure. At least 156 people, including 120 children, were killed in the Minab strike alone.

The US has previously denied striking the Lamerd sports complex and said it was investigating the Minab incident. A State Department official told the BBC that the US does not give credibility to the mission's findings.

The report also found that Iranian security forces committed killings on "a staggering and unprecedented scale" during a crackdown on anti-government protests in January, with violence reported across all 31 provinces. The mission described these acts as crimes against humanity.

Iran has not yet responded to the report's findings but has previously rejected allegations of systematic human rights violations.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The UN finding carries significant legal and political weight, potentially opening the door to international accountability mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court.
  • The report simultaneously condemns both the US and Iran, underscoring the scale of civilian harm in the conflict and the lack of accountability on all sides.
  • The findings could deepen diplomatic tensions and affect ongoing negotiations or sanctions regimes involving the US and Iran.

Background

The February strikes occurred amid a period of heightened US-Iran military confrontation. The Minab school strike in particular drew international outrage after images of child victims circulated globally. The US initially offered conflicting accounts, and independent investigations by media and human rights groups disputed the official US narrative. Separately, Iran faced widespread protests in January that were met with a severe security crackdown, drawing condemnation from human rights organizations.

Key Perspectives

United States: Rejects the findings, with a State Department official stating the US does not give the report credibility. The US has previously denied striking Lamerd and says it is investigating Minab. Iran: Has not commented on the latest report but has consistently rejected allegations of systematic human rights abuses. UN Fact-Finding Mission: Concludes both the US strikes (as war crimes) and Iran's crackdown (as crimes against humanity) violated international law, based on independent evidence collection.

What to Watch

  • Whether the US provides a substantive response or releases its own investigation into the Minab strike.
  • Whether Iran issues an official reaction or uses the report to deflect criticism of its own abuses.
  • Possible moves by international human rights bodies or the ICC to pursue accountability for either side.
  • Further reporting by independent media and rights groups on the ground verification of both incidents.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workReport an errorSubscribe