Velocity corrections improve instruction following in few-step text-to-image generation

A frozen 6B-parameter generator keeps its sampling schedule while an 18.6M-parameter corrector learns residual velocity adjustments at early steps.

Chinese Tech
Yating Gao · Zhenlong Zhu · Wen Zihao · Lenan Zhang · Jiexiong Wang · Yang Yang · +3 more

The University of Osaka · Alibaba Group · Peking University · Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Research Digest··2 min read
The authors propose a lightweight velocity correction framework for few-step text-to-image generators.

The authors keep a 6B-parameter few-step generator frozen and train a parallel corrector with fewer than 20M parameters.

Why this paper

From Alibaba Group and 3 others

In one line

A sub-20M-parameter velocity residual corrector improves few-step text-to-image instruction following by 17.60 percentage points without altering the frozen generator or adding forward passes.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors (2 noted)
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe