Wednesday 14 October 2026
Evening Edition
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Melbourne

Video shows cafe meeting where construction executive allegedly received $6m extortion threat

Four men surround manager at Flemington cafe, court hears alleged death threat in Melbourne Magistrates' Court

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
A video played in Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Wednesday shows four men surrounding a construction executive at a cafe in Flemington, with one man allegedly threatening to kill him and demanding $6 million. The footage, from December 2024 at Mama Bear Cafe, is evidence in an extortion case against Amir Teymoori and three other men.

The video, shown to the court, captures a meeting between a major Victorian developer's manager and four men. The manager's identity is suppressed for his safety. The court heard Amir Teymoori allegedly told the manager, "I'm going to f--- you up and your family."

Audio on the recording is muffled by wind, but a man can be heard swearing and asking, "Are you gonna pay me or not?" Teymoori is seen covering his mouth as he speaks before shouting at the construction firm director.

Daniel Van Camp also speaks, taking off his sunglasses to tell the alleged victim: "This is not going away." The 52-year-old is the son of John Van Camp, a prominent former union boss turned industrial relations manager at Grocon, which collapsed in 2020.

Gazanfer Bekirovski sat at the end of the table, speaking only briefly and tapping the manager on the arm. Travers Grubb did not appear to speak, tapping his foot for much of the meeting.

The construction manager told the court that the message from Teymoori was clear. One of the group can be seen pointing out the security camera that captured the meeting.

The matter is ongoing in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case highlights alleged extortion and threats within Melbourne's construction industry, raising concerns about safety for executives.
  • The video evidence provides a rare glimpse into how such threats are allegedly delivered, with potential implications for industry practices and reporting.
  • The trial will test the strength of covert surveillance and witness testimony in prosecuting serious threats.

Background

The construction industry has a history of disputes involving unions, subcontractors, and developers. Extortion and intimidation are occasionally alleged in court cases, though convictions require strong evidence. This case involves a prominent developer and a former union figure's family, adding to its significance.

Key Perspectives

The alleged victim (construction manager): He reportedly perceived the meeting as a clear threat to himself and his family, and his identity is suppressed for safety. The accused men (Teymoori, Van Camp, Bekirovski, Grubb): They are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The defense may argue the meeting was misinterpreted or that words were taken out of context. The court: Will assess the video and audio evidence, along with witness testimony, to determine whether the alleged threat constitutes extortion.

What to Watch

  • Future court dates and whether the matter proceeds to trial or resolves.
  • Any further evidence, such as phone records or additional witnesses.
  • Outcome of the case and its impact on how construction firms handle security and threats.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe