WA Greens staffer's Land Forces Expo ban temporarily lifted after legal challenge

Matilda Lane-Rose can enter the security zone on Tuesday but remains on the exclusion list as she prepares a Supreme Court challenge

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
A WA Greens staffer and activist who was fined over a planned protest at the home of former Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill has had a ban on entering the Land Forces Expo security area temporarily overturned after legal action. Matilda Lane-Rose will be allowed into the security zone around the Perth Exhibition and Convention Centre between 8am and 6pm on Tuesday, but the ban will take effect again after 8pm that day.

Matilda Lane-Rose was one of several people placed on an exclusion list by WA Police barring them from entering the area around the Perth Exhibition and Convention Centre where the defence expo is being held this week. Others on the list include Rising Tide and Disrupt Burrup Hub activist Will Shanahan.

The Human Rights Law Centre and SCALES Community Legal Centre took Lane-Rose's exclusion to the Supreme Court over the weekend, prompting WA Police to allow her to enter the security zone on Tuesday. She will remain on the excluded list and intends to pursue the ban in the Supreme Court, with proceedings scheduled for next week.

"My name is still on this list, so that is why I will be continuing to pursue my case in the Supreme Court of WA to challenge the decision that landed me on this list in the first place," Lane-Rose said. She said she intended to help her boss, Greens MP Sophie McNeill, create content outside the expo on Tuesday.

On Friday, WA Police Minister Reece Whitby said the bar had been set "very high to be an excluded person, and for very good reason." He added: "We don't want to see violence. We don't want to see people at risk, and that is the basis on which people are being excluded."

A police spokeswoman would not address Lane-Rose's matter directly but said where a complaint is received about a ban, police would work with the complainant.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case raises questions about police powers to exclude individuals from public spaces near major events and the transparency of such exclusion lists.
  • It highlights tensions between protest rights and security concerns at defence industry gatherings.
  • The outcome of Lane-Rose's Supreme Court challenge could set a precedent for how future exclusion orders are scrutinised.

Background

Matilda Lane-Rose, a 22-year-old WA Greens staffer and activist, was fined over a planned protest at the home of former Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill. The Land Forces Expo is a major defence industry event held in Perth, drawing protesters opposed to military spending and fossil fuel connections. WA Police established exclusion zones around the expo venue, placing several known activists on a banned list.

Key Perspectives

Matilda Lane-Rose and legal advocates: They argue the exclusion list was applied without sufficient justification and that the process lacks transparency. The Human Rights Law Centre and SCALES Community Legal Centre are supporting her challenge to give the list the scrutiny it deserves. WA Police Minister Reece Whitby: He maintains that the threshold for exclusion is high and justified by the need to prevent violence and protect public safety at the event.

What to Watch

  • The Supreme Court hearing scheduled for next week, where Lane-Rose will challenge the ongoing ban.
  • Whether other individuals on the exclusion list pursue similar legal action.
  • Future police practices regarding protest exclusion zones at major events in Western Australia.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.