Sunday 4 October 2026
Afternoon EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Crypto

White House Says Crypto Market Structure Clarity Must Come From Regulators, Not Lame-Duck Congress

Administration officials signal the Clarity Act is unlikely to pass before year-end, leaving rulemaking to agencies

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
White House and Treasury officials have concluded that the push for comprehensive crypto market structure legislation will not be revived during the post-election lame duck session of Congress, placing the burden of establishing clear rules on federal regulators, according to remarks at a CoinDesk policy event on Tuesday.

Speaking at CoinDesk's Policy & Regulation event on September 22, White House adviser Patrick Witt indicated that despite some industry hopes for a late-year legislative surge on the Clarity Act, the administration now sees the path forward as running through regulatory agencies rather than Capitol Hill. Treasury officials echoed that view, according to a report from the event.

The Clarity Act — a bill intended to establish a federal framework for classifying and regulating digital assets — had generated cautious optimism among crypto advocates who believed the lame duck period could provide a final window for passage before a new Congress convenes. However, the White House and Treasury are now in agreement that the legislative window is effectively closed, and that regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission will need to fill the gap with their own rulemaking.

Witt did not specify which agencies would take the lead or offer a timeline for any new regulations. The remarks underscore the continuing uncertainty facing the crypto industry, which has long sought clearer legal guardrails from Congress.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The decision effectively delays legislative clarity for digital asset markets until at least the next Congress, prolonging regulatory uncertainty for exchanges, investors, and projects.
  • It shifts the focus to agency rulemaking, which may result in a more piecemeal and less comprehensive framework than a statute.
  • The outcome could influence private-sector decisions on where to locate operations and how to structure token offerings.

Background

The Clarity Act emerged as a bipartisan effort to create a coherent federal regulatory framework for crypto markets, addressing jurisdictional disputes between the SEC and CFTC. The bill had advanced through committees but stalled amid broader legislative gridlock. The lame duck session — the period between the November midterm elections and the start of the new Congress in January — was seen by some as a last chance to pass major financial legislation before the political landscape shifts. The White House's new stance suggests it no longer sees a viable path for the bill in that window.

Key Perspectives

White House and Treasury officials: Argue that legislative action is not forthcoming and that regulators possess existing authority to provide market structure clarity through rulemaking. Crypto industry advocates: Had pushed for the Clarity Act as a comprehensive solution; they may now face a longer, less predictable regulatory process. Critics/Skeptics: Some consumer and investor protection advocates may prefer agency-led rulemaking, viewing it as more rigorous and responsive than a broad congressional mandate.

What to Watch

  • Whether the SEC or CFTC announces any new rulemaking proposals before the end of the year.
  • Any public statements from congressional committee chairs about reintroducing the Clarity Act or a similar bill in the next Congress.
  • Industry reactions and potential legal challenges to agency actions taken without explicit legislative authorization.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workReport an errorSubscribe