Sunday 11 October 2026
Morning EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
US Politics

200-year-old 'grandmother' tree destroyed for Trump's border wall despite months of protest

Federal agents forcibly removed protesters who had occupied the cottonwood for more than 70 days before contractors pushed it over

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A 200-year-old cottonwood tree in Arizona, known as the 'grandmother' to locals and activists, has been pushed down by contractors building Donald Trump's border wall, ending a months-long protest in which land defenders occupied the tree's canopy. Over 80 federal agents swarmed the site at dawn on Monday, arresting protesters and removing the final occupant from a platform high in the branches before an excavator toppled the tree, according to witnesses and social media footage.

The tree stood in the ghost town of Lochiel, Arizona, near the US-Mexico border. In late July, a group of land defenders began a tree-sit, taking turns living in a platform high in the cottonwood's canopy. The protest lasted more than 70 days. On Monday, more than 80 federal agents arrived at dawn, using a crane with a steel basket to forcibly remove the person in the tree, according to videos and photos shared on social media. Contractors from Fisher Sand & Gravel, the company building that section of the wall, then used an excavator to push the tree over. Witnesses described the tree cracking and crashing to the earth as protesters shrieked and cried.

"Seeing that – it crushes your heart," said Erick Meza, the Sierra Club's Borderlands coordinator, who had been working for months to save the trees through letters to US Customs and Border Protection. "That tree brought a lot of people together. Now there's a community response of outrage. People are pissed off."

The toppling was filmed by a team from Turning Point USA, the far-right political group, who appeared to be embedded with border patrol and given free access to roam through the closed-off public road. The tree, which was on private land, had been the centre of a campaign by environmentalists and community members who saw it as a symbol of borderland heritage.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The destruction of the 200-year-old tree eliminates a living landmark that had become a powerful symbol for opponents of the border wall.
  • The forcible removal of protesters after a 70-day occupation signals an escalation in enforcement tactics on private land near the border.
  • The event may galvanise further opposition to the wall, including legal challenges and new protest actions.

Background

The cottonwood, nicknamed the 'grandmother', stood on private land in Lochiel, Arizona, a ghost town along the US-Mexico border. The tree's preservation became a focal point for activists opposing the Trump administration's border wall, which has faced years of legal and environmental opposition. Construction on this section was contracted to Fisher Sand & Gravel, a company that has built other segments of the barrier.

Key Perspectives

Protesters and environmentalists: The tree held cultural and ecological value, and its destruction represents both a loss of natural heritage and a blow to community efforts to resist the wall through non-violent direct action. They argue the federal response was disproportionately heavy-handed. US Customs and Border Protection and contractors: The tree stood on private land scheduled for wall construction, which the government says is necessary for national security and border enforcement. The removal of protesters was framed as lawful clearing of the construction site. Critics and skeptics: Some question whether destroying a centuries-old tree for a wall segment was necessary, and whether the deployment of over 80 agents and the presence of a partisan media group reflect an unnecessarily militarised response.

What to Watch

  • Whether protesters pursue legal action against the federal government over the removal.
  • Any statement or revised environmental assessment from US Customs and Border Protection regarding the wall's route.
  • Potential new protest camps or legal challenges to wall construction on other private properties.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe