Accused murderer Beau Lamarre-Condon smiles as friend recounts 'surreal' dinner conversation

Trial continues in NSW Supreme Court: former police officer pleads not guilty to murdering Jesse Baird and Luke Davies

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Accused double murderer and former New South Wales police officer Beau Lamarre-Condon smiled to himself in the Supreme Court as a former friend testified about a Thai dinner in May 2023 during which he allegedly asked what she would do if he told her he had killed someone and needed help hiding the body. Lamarre-Condon has pleaded not guilty to the fatal shooting of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies in Paddington in February 2024, arguing self-defence.

The trial of Beau Lamarre-Condon continued this week with evidence from Georgia Cook, a former friend who recalled a dinner at a restaurant on Sydney's north shore nine months before the alleged murders.

According to Ms Cook, Lamarre-Condon asked, "What would you do if I told you I killed someone, would you help me hide the body?" She said he then described taking the victim's belongings to a dumpster and moving the body to bushland where it would never be found. Ms Cook said the conversation left her feeling scared.

Under cross-examination by defence barrister James Lang, Ms Cook was pressed on why she remained friendly with Lamarre-Condon after that conversation. Mr Lang presented a photo of the pair smiling together and read affectionate text messages Ms Cook later sent, including birthday wishes signed with exes and a teary-eyed emoji, and a message reading "Love our chaotic relationship."

Ms Cook was unmoved, repeatedly insisting: "I still stand by that I was scared. I could never forget these words being said to me, I could never forget."

Mr Lang then referred to a previous drug possession charge against Ms Cook, asking if that was why her friendship with the former police officer soured. Ms Cook said a dispute had arisen after Lamarre-Condon asked her to do unpaid bikini modelling for a swimwear line he owned.

Lamarre-Condon, who usually remains silent and impassive in court, has been noted by reporters as most animated when former friends testify against him. A childhood friend told the court that in a video call around three months before the alleged murders, Lamarre-Condon made a gun gesture with his hands and asked if her partner could get him a gun. Defence counsel John Stratton challenged that recollection, arguing the accused was checking on her safety from an abusive partner.

The prosecution alleges Lamarre-Condon, driven by obsessive and jealous infatuation with Mr Baird after their casual relationship ended, fatally shot the couple.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The trial has drawn significant public attention due to the accused's former status as a police officer and the alleged premeditation, including a dinner conversation nine months before the deaths.
  • The evidence from former friends could be central to the prosecution's case, suggesting a plan or fantasy about killing long before the alleged murders.
  • The outcome will test the strength of circumstantial and witness evidence in a self-defence argument where the accused is a former law enforcement officer.

Background

Beau Lamarre-Condon was a senior constable with the New South Wales Police Force before his arrest in connection with the deaths of Jesse Baird, a television presenter, and Luke Davies, a flight attendant, in February 2024. Their bodies were later found. The trial is being heard in the NSW Supreme Court, with Lamarre-Condon pleading not guilty and claiming self-defence.

Key Perspectives

Prosecution: Argues the murders were premeditated, driven by Lamarre-Condon's obsessive jealousy after Mr Baird ended their relationship. Evidence of a dinner conversation nine months earlier and a request for a gun three months earlier is presented to show intent. Defence: Challenges the reliability of witness recollections, highlighting inconsistencies such as witnesses maintaining friendships with the accused after allegedly alarming conversations. The defence claims the accused acted in self-defence. Critics/Skeptics: Questions remain about how a serving police officer could allegedly plan a murder, and how effectively the case can rebut a self-defence claim with largely circumstantial evidence from former associates.

What to Watch

  • Further testimony from other former friends and associates who have yet to give evidence.
  • The defence's cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, particularly around their credibility and motivations.
  • The strength of the self-defence argument when the prosecution rests and the defence presents its case.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.