Activation-based representations predict LLM value generalization across contexts

In a study of 66 alignment values, similarity in model activations when applying values in context achieved a correlation of 0.45 with actual generalization, far outperforming textual description methods.

Top University
Andy Liu · Mehar Bhatia · Karolina Stanczak · Mona Diab · Vered Shwartz · Daniel Fried

Carnegie Mellon University · Mila - Quebec AI Institute · McGill University · ETH Zurich · ETH AI Center

Research Digest··3 min read
Liu et al.

The authors formalized alignment generalization prediction — predicting how fine-tuning a model to follow a given value changes its propensity for held-out values.

Why this paper

From Carnegie Mellon University and 6 others

In one line

Representations based on model activations predict alignment generalization with correlation 0.45, far outperforming description-based methods.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe