AFL flags potential free agency changes to protect competitive balance

CEO Andrew Dillon says the league will discuss rule reforms with the players' association after the system saw top compensation picks awarded to losing clubs.

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time3 min
Sources3 outlets
AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon has confirmed the league will consider changes to the free agency system, with a focus on ensuring the rules do not distort the competition's competitive balance. Dillon said the issue would be discussed with the AFL Players Association in the next collective bargaining agreement negotiations.

The AFL will consider changes to free agency in the interests of ensuring that the system does not skew the competitive balance of the competition in favour of teams in premiership contention, chief executive Andrew Dillon has confirmed.

Speaking to this masthead during grand final week, Dillon said the free agency system, now in place for around 12 to 14 years, had started to produce results that were not anticipated when it was first introduced.

"I think what we're seeing in the last couple of years is what everyone thought would happen at the start, and it didn't necessarily," Dillon said. "But it's something that we'll talk with the players association about because competitive balance is really important. That you know, we do a lot of work around the draft, we do a lot of work around the salary cap, a lot of work around the soft cap."

Asked directly if the AFL would consider changes to free agency, Dillon said: "Yeah, with the agreement [with the players], just to make sure that the competitive balance isn't distorted."

The potential reform comes as the Brisbane Lions, once stragglers, won their third flag in a row in their fourth consecutive grand final. They attracted both Sam Draper and Oscar Allen from lowly Essendon and West Coast respectively as free agents, although the Eagles received a generous pick No. 2 for their former skipper.

The AFL had wanted to change the compensation system at the end of last year to remove compensation picks inside the top 10, and thus not compromise the draft for teams who were not finalists. However, the AFL Players Association resisted that change, and the status quo remained. As a result, Port Adelaide can receive pick No. 5 in return for exciting superstar free agent Zak Butters, and Gold Coast can gain pick No. 7 for key forward Ben King, who is crossing to Hawthorn. These deals give the clubs losing the star arguably superior compensation compared to what they could gain in a trade if they choose to match the free agent offers.

The AFL is closely watching the side deals that those clubs are making.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The free agency system directly affects how AFL clubs build their lists, and reform could change the strategic value of star players approaching free agency.
  • Changes could alter the compensation picks awarded to clubs losing players, impacting draft order and the ability of lower-ranked teams to secure top young talent.
  • The outcome of negotiations with the AFL Players Association will test the league's ability to balance player movement rights with competitive balance.

Background

The AFL introduced free agency for the 2012 season as a mechanism to give players greater freedom to move clubs after a set period of service. Under the current rules, clubs that lose a free agent receive compensation picks determined by a formula based on the player's age and contract value. The system has been the subject of ongoing debate, with some clubs receiving high draft picks for departing stars. After the Brisbane Lions won three straight premierships and have attracted free agents from struggling clubs, concerns have re-emerged that the system may benefit already strong teams.

Key Perspectives

AFL (Andrew Dillon): The league wants to ensure competitive balance is not distorted, and sees free agency reform as part of a broader package including the draft, salary cap, and soft cap. AFL Players Association: The union previously resisted changes to remove top-10 compensation picks, suggesting players value the current system's ability to facilitate movement and secure fair compensation for clubs losing talent. Critics/Skeptics: Free agency may still be skewed in favour of strong clubs who can attract free agents, while the compensation system gives losing clubs a windfall that can itself distort the draft — potentially helping teams that are already well-resourced.

What to Watch

  • Whether the AFL pushes for removing compensation picks inside the top 10, or seeks broader structural changes.
  • The AFLPA's willingness to compromise, given it blocked a similar change at the end of last year.
  • How future free agency movements of high-profile players (like Zak Butters and Ben King) influence fan and club sentiment on the system.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.