AI shell recognition technology developed to track Tasmanian rock lobsters

University scientists and commercial partners harness machine learning to identify individual lobsters by unique shell patterns

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
Scientists from the University of Tasmania's Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), in partnership with the Fiordland Lobster Company and the South Australian Lobster Company, have developed an artificial intelligence system that uses machine learning to identify individual southern rock lobsters by the unique patterns on their shells, a technique researchers compare to fingerprint or facial recognition.

Associate Professor Quinn Fitzgibbon of IMAS said the technology, called Lobster AI, analyses features on a lobster's shell to create a unique identifier. "It's just like a fingerprint or facial recognition technology," he said. "We've used AI machine learning to look at the features on the shell of the lobster, and amazingly, we've been able to show that this technology can pick up those features and they're individual. There's no two shells the same."

The development comes as the Tasmanian southern rock lobster industry, which catches just over 1,000 tonnes per year valued at about $90 million, recovers from a difficult period marked by trade restrictions and a domestic market flooded with cheap lobsters.

Fisher Joe Sayers, who docks a boat after nearly three weeks at sea, said the industry was bouncing back but costs were rising. "Now we're up to getting a few dollars in the bank from better prices, but our costs are going up all the time, like fuel and baits," he said. "So, you outlay a lot of money before you go to sea, you can outlay say $50,000 before you even throw the lines off."

Mr Sayers, who has fished for more than 30 years, said he wanted to hand over an industry in good shape to the next generation. The AI system is designed to improve sustainability and management by enabling precise tracking of individual lobsters, reducing reliance on physical tags and allowing better monitoring of stocks.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The technology could transform how fisheries manage stocks, reducing costs and improving sustainability by enabling individual-level tracking without physical tags.
  • For Tasmania's $90 million rock lobster industry, better data on catch and population could help stabilise prices and support recovery from recent trade disruptions.
  • If successful, the AI approach may be adapted to other fisheries, offering a scalable solution for species identification and conservation worldwide.

Background

Tasmania's southern rock lobster fishery has faced economic strain from trade restrictions and oversupply in the domestic market. Traditional management relies on measuring, tagging and manually recording lobsters, a labour-intensive process. The new Lobster AI program, led by IMAS in partnership with two commercial lobster companies, aims to streamline data collection using machine learning to recognise individual lobsters by their shell features, which researchers have found to be as unique as human fingerprints.

Key Perspectives

Fishers: Face rising costs for fuel and bait while prices have only recently improved; need efficient, low-cost management tools to remain profitable and pass on a healthy industry. Scientists (IMAS): Developed the AI to provide a non-invasive, accurate identification method that could improve stock assessments and reduce handling stress on lobsters. Industry partners (Fiordland Lobster Company, South Australian Lobster Company): Investing in the technology to support sustainable harvests and supply chain traceability.

What to Watch

  • How quickly the AI system is adopted by commercial fishers in Tasmania and whether it proves reliable across different conditions and lobster sizes.
  • Whether the approach expands to other crustacean fisheries or regions.
  • Any impact on lobster prices and stock health as data collection improves.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe