Australian citizen unlawfully detained for 945 days by Home Affairs, ombudsman finds

Ombudsman report details 'litany of departmental errors' spanning four decades

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
An Australian citizen was wrongfully jailed in immigration detention for 945 days – more than two and a half years – due to repeated errors by the Department of Home Affairs, according to a Commonwealth Ombudsman report that found the person was one of 30 people unlawfully held last financial year.

The person, identified only as Mx B, was born in Australia in 1989 to New Zealand parents and should have been granted automatic citizenship on their 10th birthday under the Citizenship Act. However, the ombudsman report found that “poor record keeping” and incorrect assessments by the department led to the unlawful detention.

Mx B was convicted of criminal offences and sentenced to prison in 2010. While incarcerated in 2018, Home Affairs carried out a citizenship status assessment and incorrectly concluded Mx B was not an Australian citizen, citing their brief departure from Australia as a baby. The ombudsman said officers “failed to consider relevant case law about absences from Australia.”

A second assessment in 2019 also wrongly found Mx B was not a citizen. Upon release from jail in 2022, Mx B was placed into immigration detention. Despite claiming Australian citizenship “on multiple occasions throughout their detention,” the department conducted a third assessment in 2024 and again reached the same erroneous conclusion, “failing to take into account the new information” from Mx B’s legal representative.

The detention continued until April 2025, when the New Zealand government informed Home Affairs that Mx B was not a New Zealand citizen. The department then applied the High Court’s NZYQ ruling, which had declared indefinite detention of non-citizens with no prospect of removal illegal, and granted Mx B a Removal Pending bridging visa on strict conditions.

The ombudsman report describes “three incorrect citizenship assessments” and a series of departmental failures, including incorrect assumptions and failed checks over four decades.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case highlights systemic failures in Home Affairs' citizenship assessments, with one person spending over two and a half years in detention due to administrative errors.
  • The ombudsman found 30 people were unlawfully held in immigration detention last financial year, raising concerns about broader oversight.
  • Questions remain about compensation for Mx B and whether the department will reform its processes to prevent future wrongful detentions.

Background

Australia's Citizenship Act grants automatic citizenship to certain children born in Australia to non-citizen parents who are ordinarily resident for the first 10 years of their life. The 2023 High Court NZYQ ruling ended the practice of indefinite immigration detention for non-citizens who cannot be removed from Australia, forcing the government to release hundreds of detainees. The ombudsman's report is part of an ongoing scrutiny of Home Affairs' detention practices.

Key Perspectives

The Commonwealth Ombudsman: The report found a “litany of departmental errors” including three incorrect citizenship assessments, poor record keeping, and failure to consider case law. The ombudsman has called for improved processes. Home Affairs Department: The department has not publicly commented on the specific case, but the ombudsman's findings point to systemic shortcomings in how citizenship status is assessed for detainees. Critics and advocacy groups: Detention watchdog groups argue such errors are not isolated and that the department lacks adequate safeguards to ensure people are not wrongfully detained based on flawed administrative decisions.

What to Watch

  • Whether the government announces a formal review of citizenship assessment procedures within Home Affairs.
  • Potential compensation claims from Mx B and other victims of unlawful detention.
  • Continued monitoring by the ombudsman to see if detention error rates decrease in the current financial year.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe