Australia's major parties unveil competing immigration policies ahead of federal election

Labor, Coalition and One Nation release net overseas migration targets, while Greens call for end to 'hyper focus' on the figure

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
With the next federal election potentially two years away, Australia's major political parties and One Nation have released immigration policies with sharply differing net overseas migration (Nom) targets, sparking debate over the feasibility and consequences of rapid reductions.

Both major parties, along with One Nation, have laid out competing plans to reduce immigration levels. Labor has committed to a Nom target of 245,000 for the current financial year and 225,000 in 2027-28, achieved through a combination of prioritising in-demand skills and slowing less critical visa applications, including stretching working holidaymaker wait times to three months and restricting student visa hopping.

Coalition opposition leader Angus Taylor this week announced a more ambitious plan to more than halve Labor's forecast, targeting a Nom of 100,000 for the first two years from 2028-29, before rising to 130,000 in the third year and 160,000 by 2031-32. Taylor described it as the biggest cut to immigration in Australian history. To achieve this, the Coalition would slash bridging and protection visas from more than 400,000 to 20,000 over four years, and cut temporary graduate visas to 10,000.

One Nation has outlined a plan to reduce temporary visa holders by 750,000, with a student visa cap of 115,000 annually and a Nom ceiling of 130,000 after three years. The Greens have rejected setting a specific Nom target, with leader David Shoebridge saying the focus on the figure is misguided, noting that other parties have been "chopping and changing their number over the past 18 months as soon as serious scrutiny is applied."

Former senior immigration official Abul Rizvi said achieving the targets is not guaranteed. He noted Labor has a chance if it maintains high refusal rates, but questioned whether the Coalition's drastic cut could be implemented without unintended consequences. The Nom figure, which measures long-term arrivals minus departures, has fallen to 292,000 in the year to March, from 299,000 in December, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Immigration is a major political issue in Australia, affecting housing, infrastructure, and labour markets.
  • The differing targets reflect deep divisions over how quickly and substantially to reduce population growth.
  • The next election will determine which policy direction Australia takes, with significant economic and social implications.

Background

Net overseas migration (Nom) measures the overall population gain or loss from long-term arrivals and departures, distinct from permanent migration caps. It has recently been trending downward, reaching 292,000 in March. Both major parties and One Nation have made Nom targets a key part of their platforms, while the Greens argue the number is arbitrary and distracts from deeper issues in the visa system.

Key Perspectives

[Labor government]: Promises modest cuts through targeted visa processing changes, prioritising skills in healthcare, construction, education and law enforcement while slowing less critical applications. Argues their approach is manageable. [Coalition opposition]: Proposes the largest immigration cut in Australian history, arguing it is necessary to ease pressure on housing and infrastructure. Plans to drastically reduce bridging and graduate visas. [One Nation]: Seeks even steeper reductions, with a three-year plan to slash temporary visa holders by 750,000 and impose a permanent Nom cap. Lacks detailed implementation measures. [Greens]: Rejects numeric targets, calling for a more nuanced debate about visa categories and worker rights rather than a simplistic focus on the Nom figure. [Experts (Abul Rizvi)]: Questions whether any party can hit their targets, noting that achieving the Coalition's 100,000 figure would require unprecedented policy changes and may have unintended economic consequences.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Coalition can provide a credible plan to achieve a Nom of 100,000 without causing labour shortages.
  • The next ABS Nom figures due in coming months, which will show the trajectory under current policies.
  • How the election campaign itself influences parties to adjust or harden their immigration positions.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.