Australia's Population Set to Age, Deaths to Outpace Births by 2060s: Intergenerational Report

New projections show falling fertility and rising median age, with migration seen as key buffer against fiscal and workforce pressures

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time3 min
Sources5 outlets
Australia will for the first time see deaths outpace births from the 2060s, according to the 2026 Intergenerational Report, which warns of an aging population that will strain federal finances and reduce the workforce unless migration is maintained. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the decline in birth rates was one of the biggest changes from three years ago.

For the first time, Australia has a projected date when deaths will outpace births. Japan, Italy and South Korea have already passed the point where their populations no longer grow via 'natural increase', and from the 2060s onwards Australia will join them, meaning the population will shrink without ongoing migration.

Australians are getting much older and having fewer babies, with both trends accelerating according to the latest Intergenerational Report. By 2066, the median age will be 45, up from 38 and a half today, and the population aged over 65 is expected to grow eight times faster than those aged 0 to 20.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the decline in birth rates was one of the biggest changes from three years ago. He said the government expects "fertility rates to fall further and faster", but caveated that Australia would not cross the threshold of more deaths than births until decades later than nations like Japan and South Korea, adding those were "really quite good" economies.

Old Age Dependency Ratio

The report uses the Old Age Dependency Ratio to measure pressure on the workforce. Currently, there are 29 people aged over 65 for every 100 working-age Australians. By 2066, that will rise to 39 per 100 working-age people.

The obvious conclusion, the report states, is that "a smaller share of working-age Australians will need to support a growing number of retirees who are living longer".

The federal budget will be more strained by health and aged care demands and more dependent on income tax from workers. People aged over 85 cost the federal budget as much as four working-age people contribute, and the number of 85-year-olds is expected to triple over the next 40 years. This will increase the risk of higher debt, "passing the cost of spending to future generations", unless new revenue sources are found.

Migration as a source of resilience

Continued migration is expected to be the key source of 'resilience' against the aging population, with the report describing it as a security blanket. However, the report notes a fierce political contest to cut migration could up-end that resilience.

There is expected to be a small offset from more people working later in life (with workforce participation expected to grow by 1 per cent) and from more women participating. However, an older workforce could also drag on productivity, making it harder for wages and living standards to grow.

§

Analysis

Why this matters

  • Australia’s demographic trajectory means fewer workers supporting more retirees, putting long-term pressure on the federal budget, tax revenue, and health and aged care systems.
  • The projected shift to more deaths than births, while decades away, signals a structural change that will affect intergenerational equity, productivity, and living standards.
  • Migration policy becomes a critical lever—political decisions to cut migration could undermine the resilience the report projects.

Background

The Intergenerational Report is a regular federal Treasury assessment of long-term demographic and fiscal trends, typically published every five years to inform budget and policy planning. Australia has historically relied on migration to counter low fertility, but the 2026 report revises fertility down further, making the population outlook more challenging. Similar demographic shifts have already occurred in Japan, Italy, and South Korea, which now face shrinking workforces and rising aged-care costs.

Key perspectives

  • Treasurer Jim Chalmers: Emphasizes that while fertility is falling faster than expected, Australia still has decades before facing the same threshold as countries like Japan and South Korea, and flags the flexibility provided by that extra time.
  • Federal Treasury (through the report): Positions migration as the main source of demographic resilience, while warning that without it, population decline and fiscal strain will worsen.
  • Critics of high migration: Likely to oppose continued high migration as a solution, arguing it masks the need for domestic economic reform and could have social or infrastructure costs.

What to watch

  • Whether the federal government revises its migration settings in the upcoming budget or election platform, and how political pressure affects policy.
  • Future fertility rates: The report’s downward revision suggests sustained low fertility; watch for further declines that could pull the deaths-exceed-births date earlier.
  • Productivity and workforce participation indicators, especially whether older Australians and women offset the demographic drag as projected.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.