Seven months after a massive fire tore through its petrol-processing complex, Viva Energy's Geelong refinery is producing about 90 per cent of its pre-fire capacity, while executives negotiate with the Albanese government over arrangements that could secure its operation until 2040.
The refinery, one of just two remaining in Australia, has survived changing owners, international competition and the pandemic. On April 15, a fire erupted in its alkylation unit, threatening the plant and the country's fuel security. No one was injured, and production has been gradually restored.
Australia once operated eight refineries. The remaining plants at Geelong and Brisbane produce about one-fifth of national demand; the country imports roughly 80 per cent of its refined fuel. The Geelong site also houses Australia's last polypropylene and bitumen manufacturing, supplies specialist aviation gasoline and produces industrial solvents.
Viva Energy chief executive Scott Wyatt said the crisis has shifted repeatedly. "It's kind of moved from being a crude problem to a refined product problem, and now it's a shipping problem," he said, referencing the war in the Middle East, which has choked key maritime corridors, triggered a supertanker shortage and driven freight costs up tenfold.
The Albanese government has responded with a $14.8 billion fuel resilience package, including a government-controlled reserve of diesel and aviation fuel, proposed increases to mandatory stockholdings and longer-term support for domestic refining. Energy Minister Chris Bowen has promised no refinery will close on Labor's watch.
But economists warn that stockpiling ever-greater quantities of fuel may not be the cheapest answer. Grattan Institute researchers estimate the proposed stockholding increases could require almost 4 billion litres of additional storage by 2050, with construction and operating costs approaching $17 billion. They recommend holding mandatory petrol stockpiles steady as electric vehicles reduce demand, repurposing existing tanks for diesel and aviation fuel, and accelerating electrification of heavy transport and mining. Those measures, alongside greater use of sustainable aviation fuels, could save consumers and taxpayers almost $4 billion, they estimate.
Energy analyst Tony Wood argued that building new oil refineries is neither economically viable nor a sensible answer to Australia's fuel vulnerability, given dwindling domestic crude reserves and competition from larger Asian producers. He said modest increases in fuel storage, particularly diesel, should be accompanied by accelerated electrification of cars, trucks and mining equipment to permanently reduce dependence on imported oil. For industries where electrification remains difficult, Wood said developing locally produced biodiesel and other low-carbon fuels should take priority over spending billions on new refining infrastructure.
The competing arguments expose the dilemma confronting Canberra: how to preserve critical industrial capabilities while preparing for an economy that ultimately needs less oil. Nor will arguments for taxpayer assistance be easily won amid an extraordinary financial windfall for both refineries from the conflict. In the first half of 2026, surging refining margins drove Viva Energy to a $452 million net profit, a $647 million turnaround from the previous year's loss, while Ampol's Brisbane refinery surged to $533.4 million. Yet both operators continue seeking long-term government support, arguing high current margins do not resolve multi-decade investment horizons.
The Australian Workers' Union argues losing the remaining plants would surrender irreplaceable industrial skills and expose vital supply chains. National secretary Paul Farrow said: "Without it, Australia stops. Our fuel security is our national security – but for a generation, Australia rarely treated it as the basic guarantor of our wellbeing that it is." The union is pushing for expanded domestic refining, larger reserves and a localised renewable fuels industry.
For Wyatt, securing certainty beyond 2030, when the existing refinery support arrangements expire, is key. "Nothing we do here happens quickly. These generally are big investments. They're multi-year investments." He argues Geelong's existing infrastructure and specialist workforce could also support the transition towards renewable diesel and other lower-carbon fuels. "The skills of the people here are irreplaceable."
The Geelong plant employs about 800 people, with hundreds more contractors. During major maintenance shutdowns, its workforce can swell to roughly 1500.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- Australia imports about 80% of its refined fuel, making the closure of either remaining refinery a direct blow to national fuel security.
- The Geelong plant produces products, polypropylene, bitumen, specialist aviation gasoline, that cannot be made anywhere else in the country.
- The government's $14.8 billion fuel resilience package signals a major taxpayer commitment; the debate over whether to preserve refineries or accelerate electrification will shape energy policy for decades.
Background
Australia once operated eight oil refineries. Over the past two decades, many closed or converted to import terminals as smaller plants struggled to compete with enormous Asian rivals. The Viva Energy Geelong refinery opened 72 years ago and, together with Ampol's Brisbane plant, now supplies about one-fifth of the nation's fuel. The April 15 fire in the alkylation unit, the most serious incident in recent years, was contained before it could spread through the highly flammable complex.
Key Perspectives
Viva Energy chief executive Scott Wyatt: The company needs long-term government certainty beyond 2030 to invest; the Geelong site's skills and infrastructure can also support lower-carbon fuels.
Grattan Institute researchers: Keeping mandatory petrol stockpiles steady as EVs reduce demand, repurposing tanks for diesel and aviation fuel, and accelerating electrification could save consumers and taxpayers almost $4 billion.
Energy analyst Tony Wood: Building new refineries is not economically viable; modest storage increases and accelerating electrification of transport and mining are better answers; locally produced biodiesel and low-carbon fuels should take priority.
Australian Workers' Union national secretary Paul Farrow: Losing the remaining refineries would surrender irreplaceable skills and expose vital supply chains; the union is pushing for expanded domestic refining and a localised renewable fuels industry.
What to Watch
- Whether the Albanese government announces a long-term support deal for the Geelong and Brisbane refineries before the existing arrangements expire in 2030.
- The pace of electrification of heavy transport and mining, which could permanently reduce Australia's dependence on imported oil.
- Any further disruptions to global shipping or refining margins that could affect the financial viability of Australian refineries, even amid current high profits.
Checked
11 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 11 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedAustralia’s two remaining refineries are seeking government support amid fuel-security concerns.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Yet, both operators continue seeking long-term government support, arguing high current margins do not resolve multi-decade investment horizons.”
- SupportedSeven months after the April fire, Geelong was producing about 90 per cent of its pre-fire capacity.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Seven months later, the refinery is producing about 90 per cent of its pre-fire capacity.”
- SupportedExecutives are negotiating arrangements that could secure the refinery’s operation until 2040.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Workers are dismantling damaged machinery while executives negotiate with the Albanese government over arrangements that could secure its operation until 2040.”
- SupportedThe government’s $14.8 billion fuel resilience package includes a government-controlled diesel and aviation-fuel reserve, proposed stockholding increases and longer-term support for domestic refining.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “The Albanese government has responded with a $14.8 billion fuel resilience package, including a government-controlled reserve of diesel and aviation fuel, proposed increases to mandatory stockholdings and longer-term support for domestic refining.”
- SupportedGrattan Institute researchers recommend accelerating electrification of heavy transport and mining as part of their proposed approach to fuel stockpiles.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “They recommend holding mandatory petrol stockpiles steady as electric vehicles reduce demand, repurposing existing tanks for diesel and aviation fuel, and accelerating the electrification of heavy transport and mining.”
- SupportedWyatt said: “It's kind of moved from being a crude problem to a refined product problem, and now it's a shipping problem.”Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: ““It’s kind of moved from being a crude problem to a refined product problem, and now it’s a shipping problem,” he says”
- SupportedThe fire erupted in the refinery’s alkylation unit on April 15, and nobody was injured.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “At about 11.15pm on April 15, fire erupted in the refinery’s alkylation unit. Patterson was speaking to Wyatt about securing emergency fuel cargoes when his telephone rang. He arrived about half an hour later. Emergency crews had isolated the blaze, preventing it spreading through the highly flammable complex. Nobody was injured.”
- SupportedGeelong and Brisbane are Australia’s only two remaining refineries, and together they produce about one-fifth of national demand.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “The surviving Geelong and Brisbane refineries produce about one-fifth of national demand.”
- SupportedGrattan researchers estimate proposed stockholding increases could require almost 4 billion litres of additional storage by 2050, with construction and operating costs approaching $17 billion.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Grattan Institute researchers estimate the proposed stockholding increases could require almost 4 billion litres of additional storage by 2050, with construction and operating costs approaching $17 billion.”
- SupportedThe researchers estimate their recommended measures, alongside greater use of sustainable aviation fuels, could save consumers and taxpayers almost $4 billion.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Those measures, alongside greater use of sustainable aviation fuels, could save consumers and taxpayers almost $4 billion, they estimate.”
- SupportedThe Australian Workers’ Union’s national secretary, Paul Farrow, said: “Without it, Australia stops. Our fuel security is our national security – but for a generation, Australia rarely treated it as the basic guarantor of our wellbeing that it is.”Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: ““Without it, Australia stops,” says national secretary Paul Farrow. “Our fuel security is our national security – but for a generation, Australia rarely treated it as the basic guarantor of our wellbeing that it is.””