Backpacker ballot sparks fears of staffing crisis in coastal towns

Business owners on the Mid North Coast warn a cap on working holiday visas will leave them short-handed, and push for a regional migration deal.

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
Publicans and business owners on the New South Wales Mid North Coast say a new federal backpacker ballot, which caps second-year working holiday visas at 45,000 annual places, is already prompting employees to consider leaving Australia, threatening to deepen chronic labour shortages in the region.

For publican Harry Barry, who runs pubs from Grafton to Taree, backpackers are the lifeblood of his business. He says many of his employees are considering returning home after the government announced a ballot system that would effectively cap second-year visa places. "The incentive was a guarantee they could extend their visas by another 12 months," Mr Barry said. "A lot of them are deciding that there is no guarantee that [they're] going to be earning enough money to pay [their] way."

The new system caps second-year visas at 45,000 places for those who complete the standard 88 days of regional work, with even fewer third-year places available. About 57,000 people qualified for second-year visas last year.

Mr Barry, director of the North Coast Hotel Group, has employed 80 backpackers over the past two years, with 20 still on his books. He said the reliance on visa holders was driven by a lack of local applicants. "If we're employing 80 backpackers, we're doing it for a reason, and the reason is we can't find local workers to fill the slots."

According to jobs website Seek, there were more than 130 vacancies in the Coffs Harbour region in the industry on Wednesday.

Mr Barry is backing a push to establish the region as a priority area for semi-skilled migrants through a Designated Area Migration Agreement (DAMA). A DAMA is an agreement between the federal government and a state or regional authority that helps fill roles that would otherwise remain empty, allowing skilled migrants in industries such as hospitality, agriculture and engineering to move to the area for work. These agreements are typically in place for five years before being reviewed. "[A DAMA] would certainly give us another string in our bow if we are going to be out there in a market that's trying to attract these backpackers back to our region," Mr Barry said.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Regional businesses on the Mid North Coast rely heavily on backpacker labour for hospitality and other roles. A cap on second-year visas could exacerbate existing labour shortages, affecting local economies and tourism.
  • The shift to a ballot system effectively reduces the certainty that workers and employers had under the previous uncapped arrangement, potentially deterring working holiday makers from choosing Australia.
  • If the region secures a Designated Area Migration Agreement, it could set a precedent for other coastal and regional areas facing similar staffing challenges.

Background

The federal government has overhauled the working holiday maker program by introducing a ballot system for second-year visas, capping annual places at 45,000. This represents a significant reduction from the 57,000 who qualified last year. The changes have sparked widespread concern among regional employers in tourism and agriculture who depend on this labour pool. The Mid North Coast has a particularly high reliance on backpackers in hospitality, and local job vacancy numbers remain elevated.

Key Perspectives

Business owners (e.g., publican Harry Barry): They argue that a DAMA would provide a vital alternative source of semi-skilled migrant labour if the backpacker ballot reduces the number of available workers. They stress they have been unable to fill positions with local workers. Federal government: The ballot system is intended to manage program numbers and ensure regional work requirements are actually completed, but the policy shift has alarmed industry groups who say it lacks consultation and will hurt regional economies. Critics/Skeptics: Some may question whether a DAMA is an appropriate response, arguing it could lead to exploitation of migrant workers or sideline efforts to attract local workers. Others might see the cap as necessary to manage migration levels and ensure the program is not accessed by those who do not intend to do regional work.

What to Watch

  • Whether business groups on the Mid North Coast formally apply for a DAMA and the federal government's response.
  • The actual number of backpackers who leave after the ballot system is enforced, and the resulting impact on regional job vacancy rates.
  • Any wider political fallout, particularly if staffing shortages become acute in tourism seasons.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe