Bernie Sanders introduces bill to ban federal use of automatic licence plate readers

Proposed legislation would cut federal grants to cities and states that do not outlaw the surveillance technology

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Senator Bernie Sanders has introduced a bill that would bar federal agencies from using automatic licence plate readers (ALPRs) and from accessing data collected by such systems operated by local police and private companies, in the latest challenge to the widespread deployment of the technology by firms such as Flock.

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) on Friday introduced the Ban Flock Act, which would prohibit the federal government from using automatic licence plate readers or tapping into data collected by local law enforcement and private companies. Despite its name, the bill targets all ALPR systems, not just those operated by Flock, the largest vendor in the United States with more than 120,000 cameras and a network that processes over 20 billion vehicle reads each month, according to Sanders.

The bill includes exceptions only for toll collection and for uses that Congress specifically approves in future legislation, which would have to limit data retention to no longer than 48 hours. Under the proposed law, state and local governments would lose grants from five federal departments, including the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security, unless they ban the technology. Americans could also sue the federal government over violations, and state attorneys general could enforce the law.

The legislation comes amid increasing public anger and a growing number of cities suspending or cancelling contracts with Flock. In one high-profile case, a former Milwaukee police officer pleaded guilty to misconduct after searching for his ex-partner and her ex 179 times on the platform. In response to such incidents, Flock has tightened its rules. In August, CEO Garrett Langley announced a new default data retention period of seven days, down from 30, and an audit tool that locks officers out of the system when it flags unusual searches pending review. During a recent podcast interview, when investor Jason Calacanis suggested a "double-key" system requiring two people to approve a search, Langley said the idea is "on the whiteboard."

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) are co-sponsors of the bill, which faces long odds of passing, like most proposed legislation.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The bill, if passed, would cut off federal funding to states and cities that continue using ALPR technology, potentially reshaping local policing surveillance practices nationwide.
  • It represents the most significant legislative push to regulate automatic licence plate readers at the federal level, a technology that has drawn bipartisan privacy concerns.
  • The legislation could accelerate the trend of cities cancelling Flock contracts, intensifying pressure on the company and the broader ALPR industry.

Background

Automatic licence plate readers capture the licence plates of every passing vehicle and log the location, date and time. Flock Safety, founded in 2017, has become the dominant vendor in the United States, placing cameras on public streets and private property. Supporters argue the system helps solve crimes, including vehicle theft and violent offences. Critics warn of mass surveillance and database abuse by law enforcement. The bill is the latest in a series of efforts by privacy advocates to limit the use of such technology.

Key Perspectives

Privacy advocates and civil liberties groups: They support the bill, arguing that ALPR systems create a mass surveillance infrastructure with insufficient oversight and that data is vulnerable to misuse by officers. Law enforcement agencies: Many departments view ALPRs as a valuable investigative tool for solving property crime and locating wanted individuals. They would likely oppose restrictions that limit access to the data. Critics and industry observers: They note the bill has long odds of becoming law, and even if passed, enforcement mechanisms such as lawsuits and grant cuts could face legal challenges. Some question whether state and local governments would accept the financial penalty.

What to Watch

  • Whether the bill gains additional co-sponsors or a companion measure in the House.
  • The pace at which cities and police departments continue to suspend or cancel Flock contracts.
  • Flock's response to regulatory pressure, including any further changes to its data retention and access policies.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.