Sunday 11 October 2026
Afternoon EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Australia

Burke demands Coalition cost billions for deportation plan

Home Affairs Minister accuses Opposition of 'chasing One Nation' as migration debate intensifies

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources4 outlets
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has challenged the Coalition to explain how it will pay the billions needed to deport more than 400,000 migrants on bridging visas, accusing the Opposition of playing a political game to chase One Nation voters. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor has insisted the plan cannot be fully costed until closer to the election.

Appearing on News24 on Sunday, Burke pressed the Coalition on the details of its migration policy, which was released last week. The policy would cut around 650,000 temporary migrants from the program while holding permanent migration steady at 185,000 and increasing skilled temporary workers by 100,000. Labor is aiming for net overseas migration of 225,000.

"If the Coalition is saying they're going to massively ramp up beyond what we're doing in terms of the detention capacity in Australia, then they need to let us know how many beds, how many compliance offices, and where the new detention centres are going because those sorts of numbers that they're talking about, we are talking billions and billions of dollars," Burke said.

He accused the Coalition of knowing "full well that what they've announced doesn't work, but they're playing a political game of trying to chase One Nation." Burke did not answer when asked whether Labor had made mistakes in its own management of the migration program.

The Coalition's announcement follows a migration plan from One Nation and a refresh of the Labor government's policy, both made recently. The most recent data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics serves as the backdrop to the escalating political debate over migration numbers.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The debate directly affects hundreds of thousands of people on bridging visas whose futures remain uncertain.
  • The cost of expanded detention and compliance operations would run into billions, impacting the federal budget.
  • Migration has become a key election battleground, with both major parties and One Nation competing on tougher policies.

Background

Australia has experienced high net overseas migration in recent years, straining housing and infrastructure. The number of people on bridging visas has grown significantly under Labor, prompting criticism from the Coalition and minor parties. Both major parties have now released competing policies to reduce migration, with the Coalition proposing the largest cut in Australian history.

Key Perspectives

Labor (Tony Burke): Demands the Coalition provide detailed costings and argues the Opposition's plan is unworkable and politically motivated. Coalition (Angus Taylor): Insists the plan's full cost can only be calculated closer to the election, but argues steep cuts are necessary to ease pressure on housing and services. Critics/Skeptics: Question whether either party can deliver on migration promises without damaging the economy or breaching human rights obligations, and note that Burke avoided acknowledging Labor's own management failures.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Parliamentary Budget Office produces a costing of the Coalition's plan before the election.
  • Further ABS migration data releases, which will show whether current policy is already reducing numbers.
  • The date of the federal election, which will determine how long the political debate continues.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe