Sunday 4 October 2026
Afternoon EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Australia

Chalmers links online 'monetised misogyny' to domestic violence, defends government response

Treasurer rejects call for royal commission on violence against women and children, says increased resources are the priority

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time1 min
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described 'monetised misogyny' online as one factor fuelling domestic violence, while defending the Albanese government's decision to increase resourcing for family violence services rather than support a national royal commission into the issue.

Speaking to the ABC on Tuesday, Chalmers was asked whether the government would back a national royal commission into violence against women and children. He said the government had instead chosen to increase resourcing for child and family violence and domestic violence.

"We're trying to deal with the sources of all of this violence, whether it be more security in the housing system, whether it be the monetised misogyny that we see online – there are a whole range of factors feeding in here," Chalmers said.

"We do acknowledge that all of this violence is obviously entirely unacceptable. It's horrific in every way. That's why we've increased the resources and that's why we all need to do better to do everything we can to make a difference here."

The comments come as part of a broader political debate over how best to address the high rates of gender-based violence in Australia.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Domestic violence remains a pressing national crisis in Australia, with advocates calling for structural reforms.
  • The government's rejection of a royal commission in favour of increased resourcing signals its preferred policy direction.
  • Chalmers' reference to 'monetised misogyny' online highlights growing concern about social media's role in fuelling violence.

Background

Australia has long grappled with high rates of violence against women. Governments at state and federal levels have implemented various strategies, including funding for shelters, prevention programs and legal reforms. The idea of a royal commission — a powerful public inquiry — has been pushed by some advocates who argue existing measures are insufficient.

Key Perspectives

Government (Treasurer Jim Chalmers): Defends the decision to boost resourcing for family and domestic violence services rather than launch a royal commission, arguing that direct action on multiple fronts — including housing security and online misogyny — is more effective. Victims' advocates and opposition: Many have called for a national royal commission, arguing it would provide a comprehensive review of systemic failures and produce binding recommendations. They view the government's response as inadequate. Critics/Skeptics: Some question whether increased funding alone addresses root causes such as cultural attitudes and online radicalisation, and whether a royal commission would simply delay action.

What to Watch

  • Whether pressure builds on the government to reconsider a royal commission, particularly if domestic violence rates do not decline.
  • Potential regulatory steps targeting online platforms that profit from misogynistic content.
  • Further budget announcements on housing security and family violence services.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workReport an errorSubscribe